510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Battery, Rechargeable

K030261510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 24, 200390-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.2740

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Access Battery, Inc. · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal

Cleared on Apr 24, 2003 after a 90-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

Decided
Apr 24, 2003
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HGM
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K030261Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device

  1. #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All HGM devices

HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HGM

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 132012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 32018: 32020: 12022: 12023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2011) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HGM

269in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 66 days median2010: 193 days median2011: 141 days median2012: 107 days median2014: 231 days median2015: 169 days median2017: 138 days median2018: 258 days median2025: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2025) · low 56 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HGM

5in 2019

2008: 42009: 62013: 12014: 12019: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HGM

99in 2025

2007: 352008: 172009: 422010: 642011: 832012: 442013: 162014: 302015: 442016: 172017: 272018: 302019: 412020: 192021: 712022: 872023: 692024: 1742025: 99
2007high 174 (2024) · low 16 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007356035
2008475417
2009466642
20104193064
201113141083
20124107044
20132—116
20144231130
20155169044
20161—017
20173138027
20183258030
20190—541
20201—019
20210—071
20221—087
20232—069
20241—0174
20254269099
20262—2—

What is it indicated for?

Rechargeable batteries are utilized in portable medical equipment as a primary d-c power source or as a stand-by or backup d-c power source for portable as well as stationary medical equipment with a-c providing the primary power. These devices are copies of Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or After-Market battery packs currently on the market. A sample is generally submitted by Hospitals, Medical Centers, and Biomedical or Clinical Engineering…

Read the full statement (184 words)

Rechargeable batteries are utilized in portable medical equipment as a primary d-c power source or as a stand-by or backup d-c power source for portable as well as stationary medical equipment with a-c providing the primary power.

These devices are copies of Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or After-Market battery packs currently on the market. A sample is generally submitted by Hospitals, Medical Centers, and Biomedical or Clinical Engineering Service Professionals for duplication.

There is no direct contact with the OEM’s or access to their equipment for testing purposes. The end-user provides feedback and assists in qualifying the device as to its performance, form, fit or function although we incorporate all available resources to assist us in producing a device that meets or exceeds OEM specifications. It is this process that the majority of after-market manufacturers utilize in order to duplicate battery packs for sale as replacements for the original or predicate device.

Battery packs are “device specific” and are designed to operate and fit into those OEM devices for which they were manufactured. Therefore, only qualified personnel should evaluate, test, or install these devices.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K030261: Battery, Rechargeable.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K030261

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026