510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Sonicaid Team3

K250777510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 19, 2025189-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.2740

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd. · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal

Cleared on Sep 19, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K241368 (Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd., 2025) after a 189-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1987. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Sep 19, 2025
Review
189 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HGM
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K864318 (1987). 17 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 8 generations backK864318 The Buddy System/Health Information SystemThe Buddy Systems, Inc. · 1987
  2. 7 generations backK952979 Hanc NetworkHealthtech Services Corp. · 1996
  3. 6 generations backK964408 Poseidon Cardiac Monitoring System (PCMS)Instromedix, Inc. · 1997
  4. 5 generations backK033410 Tempus 2000 Patient Monitor, Model 00-0002Remote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2004
  5. 4 generations backK082718 Tempusic Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd. · 2008
  6. 3 generations backK090285 Sonicaid FM820 and FM830 EncoreHuntleigh Healthcare, Ltd. · 2009
  7. 2 generations backK200975 Sonicaid Team3 Antepartum, Sonicaid Team3 IntrapartumHuntleigh Healthcare Limited · 2020
  8. 1 generation backK241368 Sonicaid Team3Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd. · 2025
  9. This deviceK250777 Sonicaid Team3Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd. · 2025
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK253021 ANNE MaternalSibel Health, Inc. · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K253021ANNE MaternalSibel Health, Inc. · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K864318The Buddy System/Health Information SystemThe Buddy Systems, Inc.1987—
−7K952979Hanc NetworkHealthtech Services Corp.1996—
−6K964408Poseidon Cardiac Monitoring System (PCMS)Instromedix, Inc.1997—
−5K033410Tempus 2000 Patient Monitor, Model 00-0002Remote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd.2004—
−4K082718Tempusic Patient MonitorRemote Diagnostic Technologies, Ltd.2008—
−3K090285Sonicaid FM820 and FM830 EncoreHuntleigh Healthcare, Ltd.2009—
−2K200975Sonicaid Team3 Antepartum, Sonicaid Team3 IntrapartumHuntleigh Healthcare Limited2020—
−1K241368Sonicaid Team3Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd.2025—
0 (this device)K250777Sonicaid Team3Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd.2025—
+1K253021ANNE MaternalSibel Health, Inc.2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198720
198810
199210
199310
199510
199810
200120

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K250777, 1987–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device

  1. #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K241368Sonicaid Team3
Summary page 5
…2. Predicate Device Predicate Device: Sonicaid Team3 Fetal Monitor, manufactured by Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd., cleared under K241368 The predicate device has not been subject to a design related recall. Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd. Page 5.3…
Huntleigh Healthcare, Ltd.2025—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K253021ANNE MaternalSibel Health, Inc.20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 38 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.6 years on median.
  • None of the 17 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K253021 (Sibel Health, Inc., 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HGM devices

HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HGM

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 132012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 32018: 32020: 12022: 12023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2011) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HGM

269in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 66 days median2010: 193 days median2011: 141 days median2012: 107 days median2014: 231 days median2015: 169 days median2017: 138 days median2018: 258 days median2025: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2025) · low 56 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HGM

5in 2019

2008: 42009: 62013: 12014: 12019: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HGM

99in 2025

2007: 352008: 172009: 422010: 642011: 832012: 442013: 162014: 302015: 442016: 172017: 272018: 302019: 412020: 192021: 712022: 872023: 692024: 1742025: 99
2007high 174 (2024) · low 16 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007356035
2008475417
2009466642
20104193064
201113141083
20124107044
20132—116
20144231130
20155169044
20161—017
20173138027
20183258030
20190—541
20201—019
20210—071
20221—087
20232—069
20241—0174
20254269099
20262—2—

What is it indicated for?

The Team3 fetal monitors are indicated for use by trained healthcare professionals in noninvasive and invasive monitoring of physiological parameters in pregnant women and fetuses, during the antepartum and intrapartum periods of pregnancy. The Team3 fetal monitors are intended for pregnant women with singleton or twin pregnancies from the 28th week of gestation, through to term and delivery. In cases of triplet, the Team3 fetal monitors are intended for…

Read the full statement (290 words)

The Team3 fetal monitors are indicated for use by trained healthcare professionals in noninvasive and invasive monitoring of physiological parameters in pregnant women and fetuses, during the antepartum and intrapartum periods of pregnancy.

The Team3 fetal monitors are intended for pregnant women with singleton or twin pregnancies from the 28th week of gestation, through to term and delivery.

In cases of triplet, the Team3 fetal monitors are intended for use from 30th week of gestation through 35 weeks gestation. The devices are intended for use in clinical and hospital-type facilities.

Sonicaid Team3 Antepartum is suitable for use when there is a need to monitor the following physiological applications:

• Single, twin or triplet fetal heart rates by means of ultrasound

• Uterine activity - externally sensed

• Manual fetal movement detection - maternally identified using the event marker

• Automatic fetal movement detection (defaults to OFF / Not for use in twin or triplet pregnancies)

• Maternal heart rate and oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry

• Maternal non-invasive blood pressure

• The DAWES REDMAN Cardiotocography (CTC) analysis output - advises whether a number of defined criteria indicative of a normal cardiotocograph record has been met for singleton pregnancies but not for triplet pregnancies. It provides nonspecific analysis in twin pregnancies due to nonspecific fetal movement input

Sonicaid Team3 Intrapartum is suitable for use when there is a need to monitor the following Physiological applications:

• Single, twin or triplet fetal heart rates by means of ultrasound and/or FECG

• Manual fetal movement detection - maternally identified using the event marker

• Maternal heart rate via ECG electrodes

• Uterine activity - externally or internally sensed

• Maternal heart rate and oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry

• Maternal non-invasive blood pressure

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K250777: Sonicaid Team3.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K250777

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026