510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Scantec Pad

K031894510(k) SpecialCleared Jul 18, 200329-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1570

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sonotech, Inc. · MUI Media, Coupling, Ultrasound

Cleared on Jul 18, 2003 after a 29-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 10 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 18, 2003
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MUI
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

10 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK031894 Scantec PadSonotech, Inc. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 8 of its ownK120882 Site Rite Prevue Ultrasound System and Pinpoint Needle GuideBard Access Systems, Inc. · 2012
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK152554 Site-Rite 8 Ultrasound System, Site-Rite 8 Ultrasound System with…C.R. Bard, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 4 of its ownK182281 Site~Rite 8 Ultrasound System with Cue Needle Tracking System and…C. R. Bard · 2018
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 2 of its ownK211193 BD Prevue II Peripheral Vascular Vascular Access SystemBard Access Systems, Inc. (C.R. Bard, Inc.) · 2021
  6. Descendant · 5 generations on · 0 of its ownK251673 X9 Ultrasound SystemX9, Inc. · 2025

Showing 5 of 10 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12012: 12015: 22018: 12021: 12023: 12024: 12025: 2
2011high 2 (2015) · low 0 (2013)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 10 · See all
  • K120882Site Rite Prevue Ultrasound System and Pinpoint Needle GuideBard Access Systems, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly8descendants
  • K152554Site-Rite 8 Ultrasound System, Site-Rite 8 Ultrasound System with Pinpoint GT TechnologyC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K182281Site~Rite 8 Ultrasound System with Cue Needle Tracking System and Pinpoint GT Needle TechC. R. Bard · 2018 · 3 generations on4descendants
  • K211193BD Prevue II Peripheral Vascular Vascular Access SystemBard Access Systems, Inc. (C.R. Bard, Inc.) · 2021 · 4 generations on2descendants
  • K251673X9 Ultrasound SystemX9, Inc. · 2025 · 5 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K031894Scantec PadSonotech, Inc.2003—
+1K120882Site Rite Prevue Ultrasound System and Pinpoint Needle GuideBard Access Systems, Inc.2012—
+2K152554Site-Rite 8 Ultrasound System, Site-Rite 8 Ultrasound System with Pinpoint GT…C.R. Bard, Inc.20151
+3K182281Site~Rite 8 Ultrasound System with Cue Needle Tracking System and Pinpoint GT…C. R. Bard2018—
+4K211193BD Prevue II Peripheral Vascular Vascular Access SystemBard Access Systems, Inc. (C.R. Bard, Inc.)2021—
+5K251673X9 Ultrasound SystemX9, Inc.2025—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201210
201520
201810
202110
202310
202410
202520
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K031894, 2003–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MUI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MUI device

  1. #1 K253255 Non-Sterile Ultrasound Gel Sterile Ultrasound…score 12.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (10)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K120882Site Rite Prevue Ultrasound System and Pinpoint Needle GuideBard Access Systems, Inc.20128
K102683The AdditionOb The-Addition, LLC20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K120882 (Bard Access Systems, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 8 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MUI devices

MUI Media, Coupling, Ultrasound: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MUI

2in 2024

2007: 12009: 12011: 22012: 22013: 22014: 12016: 12017: 12018: 52019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 5 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MUI

434in 2018

2018: 434 days median
2007high 434 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MUI

1in 2023

2012: 22023: 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MUI

25in 2025

2008: 22009: 22010: 62012: 12013: 12014: 22018: 22019: 22020: 22021: 132022: 12023: 22024: 22025: 25
2007high 25 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MUI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—02
20091—02
20100—06
20112—00
20122—21
20132—01
20141—02
20150—00
20161—00
20171—00
2018543402
20191—02
20200—02
20211—013
20221—01
20231—12
20242—02
20250—025
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The biocompatible ScanTac Membrane or Pad will be used during medical diagnostic ultrasound imaging to couple sound waves between the patient's body and medical imaging electronics by being affixed to the active element of the transducer. The ScanTac Pad is biocompatible, sterile, and, being solid, leaves no residue. It will be used for transcutaneous ultrasound imaging over surgical wounds, during transcutaneous biopsy and to enhance acoustic coupling…

Read the full statement (120 words)

The biocompatible ScanTac Membrane or Pad will be used during medical diagnostic ultrasound imaging to couple sound waves between the patient's body and medical imaging electronics by being affixed to the active element of the transducer. The ScanTac Pad is biocompatible, sterile, and, being solid, leaves no residue. It will be used for transcutaneous ultrasound imaging over surgical wounds, during transcutaneous biopsy and to enhance acoustic coupling to difficult geometries. The Pad is placed onto the patient, and is sufficiently adherent to remain in place during the scan due to the adhesive nature of the hydrogel. The exposed side of the hydrogel pad will be rendered lubricous with an application of ultrasound coupling sterile fluid, including ScanLube™, water or saline.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K031894: Scantec Pad.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K031894

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026