510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

The Addition

K102683510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 6, 2011111-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1570

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ob The-Addition, LLC · MUI Media, Coupling, Ultrasound

Cleared on Jan 6, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K031894 (Sonotech, Inc., 2003) and 1 other predicate after a 111-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1980.

Decided
Jan 6, 2011
Review
111 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MUI
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K802146 (1980). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2003: 1 other ancestorK802146 · Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel, · Parker Laboratories, Inc. · 1980 · recalledK072515 · Embrace Gel · Orison Corporation · 20071980198519901995200020052010
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K072515 · Embrace Gel · Orison Corporation · 2007K802146 · Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel, · Parker Laboratories, Inc. · 1980 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK802146 Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel,Parker Laboratories, Inc. · 1980 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK072515 Embrace GelOrison Corporation · 2007
  3. This deviceK102683 The AdditionOb The-Addition, LLC · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K802146Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel,Parker Laboratories, Inc.19801
−1K072515Embrace GelOrison Corporation2007—
0 (this device)K102683The AdditionOb The-Addition, LLC2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102683, 1980–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MUI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MUI device

  1. #1 K253255 Non-Sterile Ultrasound Gel Sterile Ultrasound…score 12.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K031894Scantec Pad
Summary page 1
…transducer, 21 CFR, 892.1570 NAME: DEVICE Class 11 CLASSIFICATION: PRODUCT CODE MUI PREDICATE DEVICES: ScanTec Pad K03 1894 Embrace Gel Pad K072515 Substantially Equivalent To: The-Addition is substantially equivalent in in…
Sonotech, Inc.2003—
*K072515Embrace Gel
Summary page 1
…Class 11 CLASSIFICATION: PRODUCT CODE MUI PREDICATE DEVICES: ScanTec Pad K03 1894 Embrace Gel Pad K072515 Substantially Equivalent To: The-Addition is substantially equivalent in intended use, principal of operation and technological…
Orison Corporation2007—

Also cleared against K031894: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 26.9 years on median.
  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K031894.

How does its category compare?

All MUI devices

MUI Media, Coupling, Ultrasound: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MUI

2in 2024

2007: 12009: 12011: 22012: 22013: 22014: 12016: 12017: 12018: 52019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 5 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MUI

434in 2018

2018: 434 days median
2007high 434 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MUI

1in 2023

2012: 22023: 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MUI

25in 2025

2008: 22009: 22010: 62012: 12013: 12014: 22018: 22019: 22020: 22021: 132022: 12023: 22024: 22025: 25
2007high 25 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MUI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—02
20091—02
20100—06
20112—00
20122—21
20132—01
20141—02
20150—00
20161—00
20171—00
2018543402
20191—02
20200—02
20211—013
20221—01
20231—12
20242—02
20250—025
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The-Addition provides padding for patient comfort and aids in the retention of

coupling media in a defined position.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102683: The Addition.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102683

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026