510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System)

K032113510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 23, 2003167-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.1860

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc. · NOT Microscope, Automated, Image Analysis, Operator Intervention

Cleared on Dec 23, 2003 after a 167-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 13 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 23, 2003
Review
167 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NOT
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

13 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2009: 2 descendants cleared2007: 3 descendants cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK032113 Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System)Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK071671 Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2007
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK080564 Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2009
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK111543 Virtuoso (TM) System for Ihc HER2 (4B5)Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. · 2011
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK071128 Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2007
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK141109 Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd SystemLeica Biosystems Imaging, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 13 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2007: 32008: 12009: 22011: 12012: 12013: 12014: 22015: 12026: 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 13 · See all
  • K071671Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2007 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K080564Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2009 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K111543Virtuoso (TM) System for Ihc HER2 (4B5)Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. · 2011 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K071128Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2007 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K141109Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd SystemLeica Biosystems Imaging, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K032113Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System)Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc.2003—
+1K071671Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies2007—
+1K080564Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies2009—
+2K111543Virtuoso (TM) System for Ihc HER2 (4B5)Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.2011—
+1K071128Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies2007—
+2K141109Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd SystemLeica Biosystems Imaging, Inc.20141

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200730
200810
200920
201110
201210
201310
201420
201510
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K032113, 2003–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NOT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NOT device

  1. #1 K260755 OptraSCAN Systemscore 12.2 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc. ACIS - ER/PR SW Application
Named without a submission number
—
*—Human manual visualization by conventional microscopy
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (13)

See all 13

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K071671Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies20074
K080564Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies20093
K071128Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies20072
K062756Pathiam Imaging Software for HER2/NeuBioimagene, Inc.20071

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K071671 (Aperio Technologies, 2007) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NOT devices

NOT Microscope, Automated, Image Analysis, Operator Intervention: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NOT

1in 2014

2007: 22009: 22011: 12012: 22013: 12014: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NOT

Too few NOT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NOT

1in 2018

2018: 1
2007high 1 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NOT

1in 2023

2014: 12015: 12023: 1
2007high 1 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NOT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20080—00
20092—00
20100—00
20111—00
20122—00
20131—00
20141—01
20150—01
20160—00
20170—00
20180—10
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—01
20240—00
20250—00
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) device is intended to detect, count, and classify cells of clinical interest based on recognition of cellular objects of particular color, size, and shape. In this software application the ACIS is intended for laboratory use as an accessory to the DakoCytomation HercepTest TM to aid in the detection and semi-quantitative measurement of Her2/neu (c-erbB-2) in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded normal and…

Read the full statement (287 words)

The Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) device is intended to detect, count, and classify cells of clinical interest based on recognition of cellular objects of particular color, size, and shape.

In this software application the ACIS is intended for laboratory use as an accessory to the DakoCytomation HercepTest TM to aid in the detection and semi-quantitative measurement of Her2/neu (c-erbB-2) in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded normal and neoplastic tissue.

The ACIS is capable of detecting and quantifying regions of clinical interest in immunocytochemically stained material that would otherwise be appropriate for manual visualization by conventional microscopy.

When used with the DakoCytomation HercepTestTM, it is indicated for use as an aid in the assessment of breast cancer patients for whom HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) treatment is being considered. The pathologist should verify agreement with the ACIS score.

The ACIS system is an adjunctive computer-assisted methodology to assist the reproducibility of a qualified pathologist in the acquisition and measurement of images from microscopic slides of breast cancer specimens stained for the presence of Her2 receptor protein. The accuracy of the test result depends upon the quality of immunohistochemical staining. It is the responsibility of a qualified pathologist to employ appropriate morphological studies and controls as specified in instructions for DakoCytomation HercepTestTM to assure the validity of the ACIS-assisted Her2 score.

NOTE: All of the patients in the HERCEPTIN® clinical trials were selected using an investigational immunohistochemical clinical trial assay (CTA). None of the patients in those trials were selected using the DakoCytomation HercepTest TM. The DakoCytomation HercepTest TM was compared to the CTA on an independent set of samples and found to provide acceptably concordant results. The actual correlation of the DakoCytomation HercepTest TM to HERCEPTIN® clinical outcome has not been established.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K032113: Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K032113

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026