510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2018

Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd System

K141109510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 29, 201491-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.1860Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Leica Biosystems Imaging, Inc. · NOT Microscope, Automated, Image Analysis, Operator Intervention

Cleared on Jul 29, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K071128 (Aperio Technologies, 2007) and 1 other predicate after a 91-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2003. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jul 29, 2014
Review
91 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NOT
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K032113 (2003). 4 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor2004: 1 other ancestor2026: 1 descendant clearedK032113 · Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System) · Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003K071128 · Scanscope XT System · Aperio Technologies · 2007200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K071128 · Scanscope XT System · Aperio Technologies · 2007K032113 · Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System) · Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc. · 20030
  1. Root · 2 generations backK032113 Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System)Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003
  2. 1 generation backK071128 Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies · 2007
  3. This deviceK141109 Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd SystemLeica Biosystems Imaging, Inc. · 2014
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK260755 OptraSCAN SystemOptrascan, Inc. · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K260755OptraSCAN SystemOptrascan, Inc. · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K032113Acis (Automated Cellular Imaging System)Chroma Vision Medical Systems, Inc.2003—
−1K071128Scanscope XT SystemAperio Technologies2007—
0 (this device)K141109Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd SystemLeica Biosystems Imaging, Inc.2014—
+1K260755OptraSCAN SystemOptrascan, Inc.2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K141109, 2003–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NOT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NOT device

  1. #1 K260755 OptraSCAN Systemscore 12.2 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K071128Scanscope XT System
Summary page 5
…ch substantial equivalence is claimed Predicate Device ScanScope XT Manufacturer Aperio Technologies Predicate Device k# K071128, K073677 21 CFR 807.92 requirements are specified individually below by cleared predicate device K #.…
Aperio Technologies2007—
*K073677Scanscope XT System
Summary page 5
…ntial equivalence is claimed Predicate Device ScanScope XT Manufacturer Aperio Technologies Predicate Device k# K071128, K073677 21 CFR 807.92 requirements are specified individually below by cleared predicate device K #.…
Aperio Technologies2008—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K260755OptraSCAN SystemOptrascan, Inc.20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 10, 2018Class IIZ-0046-2020Component design/selectionThe incorrect sensor was used in the assembly of the camera in the scanner instrument which can potentially generate whole slide images that impact analysis algorithm results, as well as potentially impact the visual appearance of whole…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.8 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K260755 (Optrascan, Inc., 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NOT devices

NOT Microscope, Automated, Image Analysis, Operator Intervention: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NOT

1in 2014

2007: 22009: 22011: 12012: 22013: 12014: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NOT

Too few NOT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NOT

1in 2018

2018: 1
2007high 1 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NOT

1in 2023

2014: 12015: 12023: 1
2007high 1 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NOT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20080—00
20092—00
20100—00
20111—00
20122—00
20131—00
20141—01
20150—01
20160—00
20170—00
20180—10
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—01
20240—00
20250—00
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Aperio ePathology eIHC IVD System is an automated digital slide creation, management, viewing and analysis system. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid to the pathologist in the display, detection, counting and classification of tissues and cells of clinical interest based on particular color, intensity, size, pattern and shape. The IHC HER2 Image Analysis application is intended for use as an aid to the pathologist in the detection…

Read the full statement (530 words)

The Aperio ePathology eIHC IVD System is an automated digital slide creation, management, viewing and analysis system. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid to the pathologist in the display, detection, counting and classification of tissues and cells of clinical interest based on particular color, intensity, size, pattern and shape.

The IHC HER2 Image Analysis application is intended for use as an aid to the pathologist in the detection and semi-quantitative measurement of HER2/neu (c-erbB-2) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded neoplastic tissue.

The IHC HER2 Image Analysis application is intended for use as an accessory to the Dako HercepTest™ to aid in the detection and semi-quantitative measurement of Her2/neu (c-erbB-2) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded neoplastic tissue. When used with the Dako HercepTest™, it is indicated for use as an aid in the assessment of breast cancer patients for whom HERCEPTIN®(Trastuzumab) treatment is being considered.

Note: The IHC HER2 Image Analysis application is an adjunctive computer-assisted methodology to assist the reproducibility of a qualified pathologist in the acquisition and measurement of images from microscope slides of breast cancer specimens stained for the presence of HER-2 receptor protein. The IHC HER2 Image Analysis application is intended to be used on images viewed on a computer monitor. The accuracy of the test result depends upon the quality of the immunohistochemical staining. It is the responsibility of a qualified pathologist to employ appropriate morphological studies and controls as specified in the instructions for the Dako HercepTest™ to assure the validity of the IHC HER2 Image Analysis application assisted HER-2/neu score. The actual correlation of the Dako HercepTest™ to Herceptin® clinical outcome has not been established.

The Aperio ePathology eIHC IVD System is an automated digital slide creation, management, viewing and analysis system. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid to the pathologist in the display, detection, counting and classification of tissues and cells of clinical interest based on particular color, intensity, size, pattern and shape.

The IHC ER Image Analysis application is intended for use as an aid to the pathologist in the detection and quantitative measurement of ER (Estrogen Receptor) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded neoplastic tissue.

The IHC PR Image Analysis application is intended for use as an aid to the pathologist in the detection and quantitation measurement of PR (Progesterone Receptor) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded neoplastic tissue.

It is indicated for use as an aid in the management, prognosis, and prediction of therapy outcomes of breast cancer.

Note: The IHC ER and PR Image Analysis applications are an adjunctive computer-assisted methodology to assist the reproducibility of a qualified pathologist in the acquisition and measurement of images from microscope slides of breast cancer specimens stained for the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptor proteins. The IHC ER and PR Image Analysis applications are intended to be used on images viewed on a computer monitor. The accuracy of the test result depends upon the quality of the immunohistochemical staining. It is the responsibility of a qualified pathologist to employ appropriate morphological studies and controls as specified in the instructions for the ER and PR reagent/kit used to assure the validity of the IHC ER and PR Image Analysis application assisted scores.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K141109: Aperio Epathology Eihc Ivd System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K141109

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026