510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

Med-Logics, Model ML7090

K033293510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 13, 200491-day reviewClass I21 CFR 886.4370Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Med-Logics, Inc. · HNO Keratome, Ac-Powered

Cleared on Jan 13, 2004 after a 91-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jan 13, 2004
Review
91 days
Class
Class I
Product code
HNO
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K033293Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HNO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 13, 2015Class IIZ-1268-2015Process designThe ML 7090 Calibrated LASIK Blade (CLB) will not fit into the AMO Amadeus Metal Blade Holder.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All HNO devices

HNO Keratome, Ac-Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HNO

1in 2018

2008: 12009: 12017: 12018: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HNO

Too few HNO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HNO

4in 2011

2007: 22008: 22011: 4
2007high 4 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HNO

7in 2024

2007: 322008: 312009: 852010: 842011: 902012: 1002013: 3532014: 4522015: 9662016: 1,3972017: 2,1122018: 2,2652019: 8162020: 4052021: 722022: 72023: 102024: 7
2007high 2,265 (2018) · low 0 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HNO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—232
20081—231
20091—085
20100—084
20110—490
20120—0100
20130—0353
20140—0452
20150—0966
20160—01,397
20171—02,112
20181—02,265
20190—0816
20200—0405
20210—072
20220—07
20230—010
20240—07
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The MED-LOGICS ML7090 microkeratome blades are to be used, as replacement blades for the AMO Amadeus TM Microkeratome, to perform lamellar keratectomy procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K033293: Med-Logics, Model ML7090.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K033293

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026