510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Codman Dural Graft Implant, Models 80-1471, 80-1472, 80-1473, 80-1474, 80-1475, 80-1476, 80-1477, 80-1478, 80-1480, 80-1

K033395510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 25, 2004125-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5900

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. · GXO Strip, Craniosynostosis, Preformed

Cleared on Feb 25, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K982180 (Integra Lifesciences Corp., 1999) and 1 other predicate after a 125-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1995. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 25, 2004
Review
125 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GXO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K950956 (1995). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K910555 (1992). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestor2015: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant clearedK950956 · Dura-Guard Dural Repair Patch, Dura-Guard Dura Substitute · Bio-Vascular, Inc. · 1995K973706 · Dura-Guard-Dural Repair Patch · Bio-Vascular, Inc. · 1997K982180 · Duragen Dural Graft Matrix · Integra Lifesciences Corp. · 1999 · recalled1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 4 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants K982180 · Duragen Dural Graft Matrix · Integra Lifesciences Corp. · 1999 · recalledK973706 · Dura-Guard-Dural Repair Patch · Bio-Vascular, Inc. · 1997K950956 · Dura-Guard Dural Repair Patch, Dura-Guard Dura Substitute · Bio-Vascular, Inc. · 19950
  1. Root · 3 generations backK950956 Dura-Guard Dural Repair Patch, Dura-Guard Dura SubstituteBio-Vascular, Inc. · 1995
  2. 2 generations backK973706 Dura-Guard-Dural Repair PatchBio-Vascular, Inc. · 1997
  3. 1 generation backK982180 Duragen Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp. · 1999 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK033395 Codman Dural Graft Implant, Models 80-1471, 80-1472, 80-1473…Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. · 2004
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK152481 DURAFORM Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK041518 Codman Duraform Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc. · 2004

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K152481DURAFORM Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K041518Codman Duraform Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K950956Dura-Guard Dural Repair Patch, Dura-Guard Dura SubstituteBio-Vascular, Inc.1995—
−2K973706Dura-Guard-Dural Repair PatchBio-Vascular, Inc.1997—
−1K982180Duragen Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp.19991
0 (this device)K033395Codman Dural Graft Implant, Models 80-1471, 80-1472, 80-1473, 80-1474…Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.2004—
+1K152481DURAFORM Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc.20151
+1K041518Codman Duraform Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc.2004—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199210
199510
199610
199710
200010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K033395, 1995–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GXO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K982180Duragen Dural Graft Matrix
Summary page 2
…d device vascularization. Statement of Substantial Equivalence The CODMAN Dural Graft Implant is substantially equivalent to DuraGen Dural Graft Matrix (K982180), Codman Bicol Collagen Sponge (pre- amendment), and Codman Ehtisorb TM Dura Patch (K991413) based on the subject devic…
Integra Lifesciences Corp.19991
*K991413Codman Ethisorb Dura Patch
Summary page 2
…Implant is substantially equivalent to DuraGen Dural Graft Matrix (K982180), Codman Bicol Collagen Sponge (pre- amendment), and Codman Ehtisorb TM Dura Patch (K991413) based on the subject device's similarity to the predicate devices in intended use, material, design, physical and func…
Johnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc.2000—
*—Codman Bicol Collagen Sponge
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K982180: 6 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K152481DURAFORM Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc.20150
K041518Codman Duraform Dural Graft ImplantCodman & Shurtleff, Inc.20040

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 8 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K152481 (Codman & Shurtleff, Inc., 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K982180.

How does its category compare?

All GXO devices

GXO Strip, Craniosynostosis, Preformed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GXO

FDA has decided no GXO device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · GXO

Too few GXO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · GXO

No recall names GXO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · GXO

No MAUDE report names GXO since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Codman Dural Graft Implant is intended for use in procedures where the repair or substitution of the patient's dura mater is needed.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K033395: Codman Dural Graft Implant, Models 80-1471, 80-1472, 80-1473, 80-1474, 80-1475, 80-1476, 80-1477, 80-1478, 80-1480, 80-1.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K033395

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026