510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Tutoplast Dura

K910555510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 20, 1992438-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5975

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pfrimmer-Viggo GmbH & Co. · LEM Human Lyophilized Dura Mater

Cleared on Apr 20, 1992 after a 438-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 31 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 20, 1992
Review
438 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LEM
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

31 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2004: 4 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2005: 2 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2006: 2 descendants cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK910555 Tutoplast DuraPfrimmer-Viggo GmbH & Co. · 1992
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 30 of its ownK982180 Duragen Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp. · 1999 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK032693 Duragen Plus Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp. · 2003 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 7 of its ownK041000 Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery · 2004
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 5 of its ownK052211 Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery · 2005
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK063117 Modification to Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery · 2006

Showing 5 of 31 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1999: 12002: 12003: 22004: 42005: 22006: 22007: 22010: 12012: 22013: 32014: 12015: 32016: 22017: 22022: 12025: 2
1999high 4 (2004) · low 0 (2000)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 31 · See all
  • K982180Duragen Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp. · 1999 · cites it directly30descendants
  • K032693Duragen Plus Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp. · 2003 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K041000Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery · 2004 · 2 generations on7descendants
  • K052211Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery · 2005 · 3 generations on5descendants
  • K063117Modification to Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery · 2006 · 3 generations on3descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K910555Tutoplast DuraPfrimmer-Viggo GmbH & Co.1992—
+1K982180Duragen Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp.19991
+2K032693Duragen Plus Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp.20031
+2K041000Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery2004—
+3K052211Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery2005—
+3K063117Modification to Durepair Dura Regeneration MatrixMedtronic Neurosurgery2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200210
200320
200440
200520
200620
200720
201010
201220
201330
201410
201530
201620
201720
202210
202520
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K910555, 1992–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LEM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (31)

See all 31

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K982180Duragen Dural Graft MatrixIntegra Lifesciences Corp.199930
K031850Durasis Dural SubstituteCook Biotech, Inc.20032

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K982180 (Integra Lifesciences Corp., 1999) has gone furthest, with 30 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LEM devices

LEM Human Lyophilized Dura Mater: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LEM

FDA has decided no LEM device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · LEM

Too few LEM 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LEM

No recall names LEM since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LEM

No MAUDE report names LEM since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K910555: Tutoplast Dura.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K910555

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026