510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Intra Oral Camera System & Accessories, Model Win-100D

K040691510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 23, 20046-day reviewClass I21 CFR 872.6640

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Win-Us Technology Co., Ltd. · EIA Unit, Operative Dental

Cleared on Mar 23, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K981663 (Digital Doc, LLC, 1998) after a 6-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998.

Decided
Mar 23, 2004
Review
6 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EIA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K981663 (1998). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K981663 · Digital Doc · Digital Doc, LLC · 1998199619982000200220042006
K981663 · Digital Doc · Digital Doc, LLC · 19980
  1. Root · 1 generation backK981663 Digital DocDigital Doc, LLC · 1998
  2. This deviceK040691 Intra Oral Camera System & Accessories, Model Win-100DWin-Us Technology Co., Ltd. · 2004
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K981663Digital DocDigital Doc, LLC1998—
0 (this device)K040691Intra Oral Camera System & Accessories, Model Win-100DWin-Us Technology Co., Ltd.2004—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K040691, 1998–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EIA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EIA device

  1. #1 K231845 Dental unit Model: Marescore 14.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K981663Digital Doc
Summary page 1
…on Name: Unit, Operative, Dental 10-Substantial Equivalency is claimed against the following device: DIGITAL DOG from Digital Doc, Inc. 510Ok # K981663 manual)…
Digital Doc, LLC1998—

Also cleared against K981663: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K981663.

How does its category compare?

All EIA devices

EIA Unit, Operative Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EIA

7in 2025

2007: 32008: 62009: 32010: 32011: 52012: 22013: 22014: 22015: 72016: 42017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12022: 32023: 32024: 32025: 72026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2015) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EIA

178in 2025

2007: 90 days median2008: 72 days median2009: 109 days median2010: 270 days median2011: 150 days median2015: 214 days median2016: 182 days median2022: 265 days median2023: 686 days median2024: 251 days median2025: 178 days median
2007high 686 (2023) · low 72 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EIA

1in 2013

2012: 12013: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EIA

47in 2025

2010: 22011: 32012: 72013: 62014: 2552015: 4522016: 1512017: 642018: 732019: 682020: 482021: 492022: 442023: 532024: 532025: 47
2007high 452 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EIA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200739000
200867200
2009310900
2010327002
2011515003
20122—17
20132—16
20142—0255
201572140452
201641820151
20171—064
20182—073
20192—068
20201—048
20210—049
20223265044
20233686053
20243251053
20257178047
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Win-100D intra oral camera system and accessories is indicated for use to provide the dentist and the patient with a view of the mouth before and after the dental procedure, which assists the dentist in describing the dental procedure being performed as well as showing the results.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K040691: Intra Oral Camera System & Accessories, Model Win-100D.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K040691

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026