510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Quinton Q-TE; RMS

K041607510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Jul 16, 200431-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Quinton Cardiology, Inc. · MHX Monitor, Physiological, Patient (With Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms)

Cleared on Jul 16, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K003576 (Quinton, Inc., 2001) after a 31-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2001. 4 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jul 16, 2004
Review
31 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MHX
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K003576 (2001). 4 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2018: 1 descendant cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant clearedReference device: K974149 · Ambulatory X-12 Telemetry Module · Mortara Instrument, Inc. · 1998 · recalledReference device: K000882 · Datex-Ohmeda CS/3 Telemetry System · Datex-Ohmeda · 2000K003576 · Q-Tel RMS (Rehabilitation Management System), Model 000503 · Quinton, Inc. · 2001 · recalled200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant K003576 · Q-Tel RMS (Rehabilitation Management System), Model 000503 · Quinton, Inc. · 2001 · recalled0
  1. Root · 1 generation backK003576 Q-Tel RMS (Rehabilitation Management System), Model 000503Quinton, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK041607 Quinton Q-TE; RMSQuinton Cardiology, Inc. · 2004
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK050778 Telerehad 2004Scottcare · 2005
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK212883 ers2 - ergoline Rehabilitation SystemErgoline GmbH · 2022
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK250259 TeleRehab Aermos Cardiopulmonary RehabilitationThe ScottCare Corporation · 2025
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK173969 Medicalgorithmics Unified Cardiac Rehabilitation SystemMedicalgorithmics S.A. · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K050778Telerehad 2004Scottcare · 2005 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K212883ers2 - ergoline Rehabilitation SystemErgoline GmbH · 2022 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K250259TeleRehab Aermos Cardiopulmonary RehabilitationThe ScottCare Corporation · 2025 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K173969Medicalgorithmics Unified Cardiac Rehabilitation SystemMedicalgorithmics S.A. · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K003576Q-Tel RMS (Rehabilitation Management System), Model 000503Quinton, Inc.20011
0 (this device)K041607Quinton Q-TE; RMSQuinton Cardiology, Inc.2004—
+1K050778Telerehad 2004Scottcare2005—
+2K212883ers2 - ergoline Rehabilitation SystemErgoline GmbH2022—
+3K250259TeleRehab Aermos Cardiopulmonary RehabilitationThe ScottCare Corporation2025—
+1K173969Medicalgorithmics Unified Cardiac Rehabilitation SystemMedicalgorithmics S.A.2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
201810
202210
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K041607, 2001–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MHX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MHX device

  1. #1 K251702 IntelliVue Patient Monitor MX750; IntelliVue…score 23.0 · 40 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K003576Q-Tel RMS (Rehabilitation Management System), Model 000503
Summary page 1
…frequency physiological signal transmitter and receiver 10. The Q-Tel RMS is substantially equivalent to the Q-Tel RMS (K003576). 11. Description: The Q-Tel RMS telemetry system measures the electrical activity of a patient's heart during an exercise c…
Quinton, Inc.20011
†K974149Ambulatory X-12 Telemetry ModuleMortara Instrument, Inc.19981
†K000882Datex-Ohmeda CS/3 Telemetry SystemDatex-Ohmeda2000—

What descends from it? (4)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K050778Telerehad 2004Scottcare20052
K173969Medicalgorithmics Unified Cardiac Rehabilitation SystemMedicalgorithmics S.A.20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 18, 2020Class IIZ-1818-2020Device DesignImpacted Welch Allyn products may not meet the Defibrillation Withstand requirements of EN/IEC 60601-2-25 Medical Electrical Equipment.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K050778 (Scottcare, 2005) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MHX devices

MHX Monitor, Physiological, Patient (With Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MHX

8in 2025

2007: 152008: 162009: 132010: 202011: 122012: 162013: 212014: 132015: 142016: 132017: 142018: 112019: 72020: 112021: 52022: 152023: 82024: 52025: 82026 (partial year): 14
2007high 21 (2013) · low 5 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MHX

192in 2025

2007: 96 days median2008: 58 days median2009: 57 days median2010: 90 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 120 days median2014: 248 days median2015: 203 days median2016: 149 days median2017: 134 days median2018: 203 days median2019: 243 days median2020: 196 days median2021: 195 days median2022: 189 days median2023: 229 days median2024: 181 days median2025: 192 days median2026 (partial year): 205 days median
2007high 248 (2014) · low 57 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MHX

21so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 32008: 22009: 72010: 132011: 162012: 112013: 142014: 62015: 52016: 72017: 62018: 122019: 62022: 62023: 32024: 32025: 152026 (partial year): 21
2007high 21 (2026) · low 0 (2020)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MHX

3,761in 2025

2007: 1312008: 2322009: 3822010: 9552011: 9492012: 6762013: 1,9972014: 1,6092015: 1,2842016: 1,1052017: 1,1152018: 2,1572019: 1,4622020: 1,7142021: 2,4232022: 1,4702023: 2,2542024: 2,8142025: 3,761
2007high 3,761 (2025) · low 131 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MHX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715963131
200816582232
200913577382
2010209013955
2011128116949
2012168811676
201321120141,997
20141324861,609
20151420351,284
20161314971,105
20171413461,115
201811203122,157
2019724361,462
20201119601,714
2021519502,423
20221518961,470
2023822932,254
2024518132,814
20258192153,761
20261420521—

What is it indicated for?

The device is intended to acquire and transmit electrocardiograph (ECG) data by means of a radio-frequency transmitter worn by individual patients in a hospital or clinical setting to a central monitor where it is received, displayed, stored, and analyzed, with alarms for heart rate, arrhythmia, and ST change. The device is to be used on ambulatory adult populations where monitoring is prescribed while undergoing exercise rehabilitation. Multiple central…

Read the full statement (171 words)

The device is intended to acquire and transmit electrocardiograph (ECG) data by means of a radio-frequency transmitter worn by individual patients in a hospital or clinical setting to a central monitor where it is received, displayed, stored, and analyzed, with alarms for heart rate, arrhythmia, and ST change.

The device is to be used on ambulatory adult populations where monitoring is prescribed while undergoing exercise rehabilitation.

Multiple central receivers may be used and connected to a local area network.

Specified wireless data entry devices may be connected to the system via a wireless access point and be used as a station for entry of patient session data.

Optional workstation(s) may be connected to the system via a network for entering and viewing patient demographic and rehab session data. The workstation may also be used for tracking patient progress in cardiac rehab and displaying non-real-time waveforms and alarms.

ECG analysis may include 12-lead EGG interpretation.

Patient demographics, exercise prescription, scheduling information, and collected data can be ported to an outcomes management program.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K041607: Quinton Q-TE; RMS.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K041607

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026