510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2013

8600 Vital Signs Monitor

K042569510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 29, 20048-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2300Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Criticare Systems, Inc. · MWI Monitor, Physiological, Patient (Without Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms)

Cleared on Sep 29, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K012059 (Criticare Systems, Inc., 2001) after an 8-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1995. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
Sep 29, 2004
Review
8 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MWI
Recalls
3
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K942737 (1995). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestorK942737 · Poet IQ with Five Agent Capability · Criticare Systems, Inc. · 1995K012059 · 8100/8500 Vital Signs Monitor · Criticare Systems, Inc. · 2001199619982000200220042006
Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K012059 · 8100/8500 Vital Signs Monitor · Criticare Systems, Inc. · 2001K942737 · Poet IQ with Five Agent Capability · Criticare Systems, Inc. · 19950
  1. Root · 2 generations backK942737 Poet IQ with Five Agent CapabilityCriticare Systems, Inc. · 1995
  2. 1 generation backK012059 8100/8500 Vital Signs MonitorCriticare Systems, Inc. · 2001
  3. This deviceK042569 8600 Vital Signs MonitorCriticare Systems, Inc. · 2004
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K942737Poet IQ with Five Agent CapabilityCriticare Systems, Inc.1995—
−1K0120598100/8500 Vital Signs MonitorCriticare Systems, Inc.2001—
0 (this device)K0425698600 Vital Signs MonitorCriticare Systems, Inc.2004—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K042569, 1995–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MWI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MWI device

  1. #1 K230457 Empatica Health Monitoring Platform…score 28.0 · 39 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K0120598100/8500 Vital Signs Monitor
Summary page 1
…me: Vital Signs Monitor Classification Name: Monitor, Physiological, Patient (74 MWI) Substantial Equivalence is claimed to : CSI Model 8100/ 8500 Vital Signs Monitor (K012059) Device Description: The 8600 monitor measures and displays real time physiological data of the patient, including waveforms an…
Criticare Systems, Inc.2001—

Also cleared against K012059: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 21, 2013Class IIZ-0810-2014Device DesignThe main board, P/N 301641, installed in some Medrad Veris MR Monitor units may be faulty and could lead to unexpected shutdown of the system while in use, resulting in the loss of vital signs information from the monitor.
Apr 15, 2013Class IIZ-1586-2013Device DesignThe firm is recalling these power cables due to a latent design reliability issue and the potential for shorting which can result in heating/melting of the cable jacket.
Sep 29, 2006Not classifiedZ-0259-2007OtherInterference problems: certain invasive blood pressure transducers connected to these cables are susceptible to interference if exposed to static magnetic field strengths exceeding 300 gauss. In certain orientations, the transducer causes…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 6.5 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K012059.

How does its category compare?

All MWI devices

MWI Monitor, Physiological, Patient (Without Arrhythmia Detection Or Alarms): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MWI

4in 2025

2007: 92008: 92009: 62010: 172011: 112012: 132013: 202014: 162015: 192016: 122017: 132018: 112019: 142020: 82021: 92022: 52023: 82024: 102025: 42026 (partial year): 6
2007high 20 (2013) · low 4 (2025)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MWI

247in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 49 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 58 days median2011: 78 days median2012: 104 days median2013: 85 days median2014: 148 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 165 days median2017: 205 days median2018: 217 days median2019: 255 days median2020: 138 days median2021: 161 days median2022: 231 days median2023: 250 days median2024: 202 days median2025: 247 days median2026 (partial year): 239 days median
2007high 255 (2019) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MWI

9so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 12009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 52013: 32014: 62015: 12017: 22019: 42022: 22024: 52026 (partial year): 9
2007high 9 (2026) · low 0 (2016)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MWI

182in 2025

2007: 32008: 32009: 202010: 172011: 162012: 312013: 422014: 302015: 312016: 512017: 852018: 1582019: 1692020: 1102021: 1882022: 1682023: 1792024: 1202025: 182
2007high 188 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MWI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200794213
200894913
20096112220
20101758217
20111178316
201213104531
20132085342
201416148630
201519127131
201612165051
201713205285
2018112170158
2019142554169
202081380110
202191610188
202252312168
202382500179
2024102025120
202542470182
202662399—

What is it indicated for?

This system is intended to monitor physiological parameters of patients within any healthcare environment. The user, responsible to interpret the monitored data made available, will be a professional health care provider. Physiological data, system alarms and patient data analysis will be available to the care provider from the monitor.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K042569: 8600 Vital Signs Monitor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K042569

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026