510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCalc-I-Oss
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Ultradent Products, Inc. · LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic
Cleared on Jul 19, 2005 as substantially equivalent to P800035 (Curasan AG, 1981) after a 300-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1981. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Jul 19, 2005
- Review
- 300 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LYC
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to P800035 (1981). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | P800035 | Peri-Oss | Curasan AG | 1981 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K042583 | Calc-I-Oss | Ultradent Products, Inc. | 2005 | — |
| +1 | K131385 | Easy-Graft | Degradable Solutions AG | 2013 | — |
| +1 | K062102 | Odoncer | Teknimed, S.A. | 2007 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LYC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LYC device
- #1 K253317 Cytrans™ Elashieldscore 14.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | P800035 | Peri-OssSummary page 1…ssification: 11 (21CFR 872.3930) 3. Legally Marketed Predicate Devices to which Equivalence is Claimed: Predicate Device Identified: Cerasorb Dental (P800035). Predicate Corn arison Table calc-i-oss Legally marketed Cerasor… | 1981 |
What descends from it? (2)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All LYC devicesLYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LYC
3in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LYC
267in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · LYC
1in 2018
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · LYC
2in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code LYC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 13 | 80 | 0 | 23 |
| 2008 | 8 | 73 | 0 | 25 |
| 2009 | 14 | 100 | 1 | 25 |
| 2010 | 13 | 164 | 2 | 28 |
| 2011 | 9 | 224 | 0 | 21 |
| 2012 | 5 | 120 | 2 | 10 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 0 | 12 |
| 2014 | 1 | — | 0 | 9 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 14 |
| 2016 | 2 | — | 2 | 140 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 19 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 1 | 14 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 15 |
| 2020 | 3 | 156 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 12 |
| 2022 | 2 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 9 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 3 | 267 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 3 | 266 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Defects after removal of bone cysts,
Periodontal defects in combination with membranes,
Augmentation of alveolar crest, possibly in combination with autologous bone and membrane
(Guided Bone Regeneration)
Apicoectomy
Extraction defects in combination with membranes
Defects after surgical removal of retained teeth
Sinus floor elevations
Defects after removal of autologous bone
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K042583 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K042583: Calc-I-Oss.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K042583
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026