510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IS 40 Micromotor

K042787510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 17, 200472-day reviewClass I21 CFR 872.4200

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Satelec · EFB Handpiece, Air-Powered, Dental

Cleared on Dec 17, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K031145 (Dentsply Intl., 2003) after a 72-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1998.

Decided
Dec 17, 2004
Review
72 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EFB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K983183 (1998). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK983183 Gyro Long-Life,Black Pearl Eco, Ondine &Croma, Prestige, Bora…Bien Air USA, Inc. · 1998
  2. 1 generation backK031145 Estylus Electric Motor SystemDentsply Intl. · 2003
  3. This deviceK042787 IS 40 MicromotorSatelec · 2004
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K983183Gyro Long-Life,Black Pearl Eco, Ondine &Croma, Prestige, Bora, Aquilon…Bien Air USA, Inc.1998—
−1K031145Estylus Electric Motor SystemDentsply Intl.2003—
0 (this device)K042787IS 40 MicromotorSatelec2004—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K042787, 1998–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EFB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EFB device

  1. #1 K262144 DIAMED Handpiece;DIAMED Airmotor;DIAMED…score 13.3 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K031145Estylus Electric Motor System
Summary page 1
…ally equivalent to the predicate device by Dentsply International, the eStylus T M Electric Motor System (K031145) previously cleared by the FDA and currently marketed. D. Device Description The IS 40 Micromotor with internal s…
Dentsply Intl.2003—

Also cleared against K031145: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.6 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K031145.

How does its category compare?

All EFB devices

EFB Handpiece, Air-Powered, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EFB

1in 2025

2007: 122008: 72009: 112010: 82011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 72015: 72016: 32017: 72018: 32019: 32020: 52021: 22022: 52023: 42024: 52025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 12 (2007) · low 1 (2025)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EFB

209in 2024

2007: 61 days median2008: 97 days median2009: 120 days median2010: 116 days median2011: 168 days median2012: 130 days median2013: 207 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 296 days median2016: 205 days median2017: 246 days median2018: 210 days median2019: 348 days median2020: 259 days median2022: 430 days median2023: 158 days median2024: 209 days median2026 (partial year): 252 days median
2007high 430 (2022) · low 61 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EFB

No recall names EFB since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · EFB

83in 2025

2007: 132008: 192009: 402010: 782011: 962012: 972013: 612014: 732015: 872016: 1222017: 1532018: 812019: 1172020: 942021: 1232022: 1572023: 1162024: 1042025: 83
2007high 157 (2022) · low 13 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EFB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071261013
2008797019
200911120040
20108116078
20114168096
20128130097
20133207061
20147200073
20157296087
201632050122
201772460153
20183210081
201933480117
20205259094
20212—0123
202254300157
202341580116
202452090104
20251—083
202642520—

What is it indicated for?

The intended use of the IS40 Micromotor is in general dentistry for cutting, shaping, drilling, cleaning, prophylaxis and polishing of teeth by dental professionals.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K042787: IS 40 Micromotor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K042787

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026