510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Depuy Cas Knee Instrumentation

K043223510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 4, 2005102-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Mar 4, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K031337 (Biomet, Inc., 2003) and 1 other predicate after a 102-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1991. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Mar 4, 2005
Review
102 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K905070 (1991). 18 ancestors in all, the oldest K861692 (1986). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors1986: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor2006: 1 descendant clearedK905070 · Vistar · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1991K961168 · Viewpoint · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1996×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K963221 (1997), K970604 (1997) K984298 · Z Kat Flurotactic Guidance System Mki · Z-Kat, Inc. · 1999K013025 · Modification to Flourolab Plus · Z-Kat, Inc. · 2001K031337 · Acumen Surgical Navigation System · Biomet, Inc. · 20031990200020102020
  1. Root · 7 generations backK905070 VistarPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1991
  2. 6 generations backK961168 ViewpointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1996
  3. 5 generations backK963221 Optical Digitizer Option for View PointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1997
  4. 4 generations backK970604 Viewpoint - 3.0 SoftwarePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1997
  5. 3 generations backK984298 Z Kat Flurotactic Guidance System MkiZ-Kat, Inc. · 1999
  6. 2 generations backK013025 Modification to Flourolab PlusZ-Kat, Inc. · 2001
  7. 1 generation backK031337 Acumen Surgical Navigation SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2003
  8. This deviceK043223 Depuy Cas Knee InstrumentationDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2005
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK053348 Stryker Orthopaedics Rfid InstrumentationHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2006

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K053348Stryker Orthopaedics Rfid InstrumentationHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2006 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K905070VistarPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1991—
−6K961168ViewpointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1996—
−5K963221Optical Digitizer Option for View PointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1997—
−4K970604Viewpoint - 3.0 SoftwarePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1997—
−3K984298Z Kat Flurotactic Guidance System MkiZ-Kat, Inc.1999—
−2K013025Modification to Flourolab PlusZ-Kat, Inc.2001—
−1K031337Acumen Surgical Navigation SystemBiomet, Inc.2003—
0 (this device)K043223Depuy Cas Knee InstrumentationDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2005—
+1K053348Stryker Orthopaedics Rfid InstrumentationHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2006—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198610
199410
199510
199620
199710
199910
200010
200210
200310
200410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K043223, 1991–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K031337Acumen Surgical Navigation System
Summary page 1
…; Class II Device Product Code: HAW Substantially Equivalent Device: .* VectorVision CT-Free Knee *K031337 Acumen Surgical Navigation System *K033011 Zimmer…
Biomet, Inc.2003—
*K033011Zimmer Ortho Guidance Systems- Knee Instruments
Summary page 1
…e Knee *K031337 Acumen Surgical Navigation System *K033011 Zimmer Ortho Guidance Systems- Knee Instruments Device Description and Intended Use: De…
Zimmer, Inc.2004—
*—VectorVision CT-Free Knee
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K031337: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K053348Stryker Orthopaedics Rfid InstrumentationHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20060

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 3, 2020Class IIZ-1169-2020Process controlThe device will not connect to the Specialist 2 Locating Outrigger which renders them unusable in surgery.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 3 of the 18 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K053348 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2006) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K031337.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

Instruments are tracked by a passive marker sensor system that acquires landmarks of the bone surface when interfaced with computer hardware and software. This enables a surgeon to accurately navigate the position of instrumentation by a virtual 3-D computer generated image for precise bone cuts during minimally invasive intraoperative knee reconstructive procedures. The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotaxic…

Read the full statement (126 words)

Instruments are tracked by a passive marker sensor system that acquires landmarks of the bone surface when interfaced with computer hardware and software. This enables a surgeon to accurately navigate the position of instrumentation by a virtual 3-D computer generated image for precise bone cuts during minimally invasive intraoperative knee reconstructive procedures. The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotaxic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as a long bone, can be identified relative to a CT or MR based model of the anatomy.

Example orthopaedic procedures for these instruments include, but are not limited to:

*Total Knee Replacement

*Unicondylar Knee Replacement

*Ligament Balancing

-Range of Motion Analysis

*Cruciate Ligament Surgery

-Patella Tracking

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K043223: Depuy Cas Knee Instrumentation.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K043223

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026