510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2017

Newdeal Ankle Nail

K050882510(k) TraditionalCleared May 27, 200550-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3020Recalls 5

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

New Deal, S.A. · HSB Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories

Cleared on May 27, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K983942 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 1998) and 2 other predicates after a 50-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1998. 15 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 5 times.

Decided
May 27, 2005
Review
50 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HSB
Recalls
5
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K982953 (1998). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K974781 (1998). 15 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2002: 1 other ancestor1998: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor2009: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant clearedK982953 · Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various Styles · Biomet, Inc. · 1998 · recalledK021786 · Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis Nail · Biomet, Inc. · 2002 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 6 descendants3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 2 descendants5 generations forward: 2 descendants6 generations forward: 1 descendant7 generations forward: 1 descendant K021786 · Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis Nail · Biomet, Inc. · 2002 · recalledK982953 · Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various Styles · Biomet, Inc. · 1998 · recalled0+5
  1. Root · 2 generations backK982953 Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various StylesBiomet, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK021786 Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK050882 Newdeal Ankle NailNew Deal, S.A. · 2005
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 14 of its ownK091788 Panta Nail (Dia. 10MM), Panta Nail XLNewdeal Sas · 2009 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 7 of its ownK102413 Fuze: Intramedullary Internal Fixation NailVilex, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 6 of its ownK191782 TTC Phantom Intramedullary Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2019
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 5 of its ownK201227 Phantom® Hindfoot TTC/TC Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2020
  8. Descendant · 5 generations on · 2 of its ownK210869 Phantom Hindfoot TTC/TC Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2021 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 15 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2009: 12011: 12012: 12015: 22018: 22019: 12020: 12021: 12023: 12024: 12025: 22026: 1
2009high 2 (2015) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 15 · See all
  • K091788Panta Nail (Dia. 10MM), Panta Nail XLNewdeal Sas · 2009 · cites it directly14descendants
  • K102413Fuze: Intramedullary Internal Fixation NailVilex, Inc. · 2011 · 2 generations on7descendants
  • K191782TTC Phantom Intramedullary Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2019 · 3 generations on6descendants
  • K201227Phantom® Hindfoot TTC/TC Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2020 · 4 generations on5descendants
  • K210869Phantom Hindfoot TTC/TC Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc. · 2021 · 5 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K982953Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various StylesBiomet, Inc.19984
−1K021786Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc.20021
0 (this device)K050882Newdeal Ankle NailNew Deal, S.A.2005—
+1K091788Panta Nail (Dia. 10MM), Panta Nail XLNewdeal Sas20092
+2K102413Fuze: Intramedullary Internal Fixation NailVilex, Inc.20113
+3K191782TTC Phantom Intramedullary Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc.2019—
+4K201227Phantom® Hindfoot TTC/TC Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc.2020—
+5K210869Phantom Hindfoot TTC/TC Nail SystemParagon 28, Inc.20213

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199820
199910
200010
200210

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
201110
201210
201520
201820
201910
202010
202110
202310
202410
202520
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K050882, 1998–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HSB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HSB device

  1. #1 K200869 Gamma3 Systemscore 19.8 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K983942Intramedullary Nail System, Locking Screw, Nail Cap
Summary page 2
…ivalent in terms of design, indications for use and dimensions with the following predicate devices: Smith & Nephew ReVision Nail K983942 DePuy VersaNail K023115 Biomet Ankle Arthrodesis Nail…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.1998—
*K023115Ace Versanail
Summary page 2
…with the following predicate devices: Smith & Nephew ReVision Nail K983942 DePuy VersaNail K023115 Biomet Ankle Arthrodesis Nail K021786 H. Comparison of Technological Characteristics…
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2002—
*K021786Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis Nail
Summary page 2
…ReVision Nail K983942 DePuy VersaNail K023115 Biomet Ankle Arthrodesis Nail K021786 H. Comparison of Technological Characteristics…
Biomet, Inc.20021

Also cleared against K983942: 17 other devices →

What descends from it? (15)

See all 15

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K091788Panta Nail (Dia. 10MM), Panta Nail XLNewdeal Sas200914
K121575Oxford Ankle Fusion Nail (Afn) SystemOrtho Solutions Limited20121

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 3, 2017Class IIZ-1539-2017Packaging change controlVoluntary recall/Removal of Panta and Panta XI Nails because there may be the potential that the internal and external package seal does not provide the level of sterility intended.
May 9, 2013Class IIZ-1736-2013Device DesignAs a result of the investigation into an adverse trend of complaints for reports of misalignment of the calcaneal or tibial screws during use of the Panta Nail Support Device, Integra has decided to issue this voluntary medical device…
May 19, 2011Not classifiedZ-1428-2012Use errorThe firm received multiple complaints from their user customers (surgeons) who reported encountering difficulty inserting a calcaneal or tibial screw through the holes of the PANTA nail.
Mar 1, 2010Not classifiedZ-0308-2011Nonconforming Material/ComponentInability to properly align the calcaneal screw placement on a consistent basis, due to a manufacturing defect of of the targeting frame (Panta Support Device).
Mar 24, 2008Not classifiedZ-1877-2008Process controlCertain PANTA Nails from one lot were incorrectly manufactured. The internal thread for certain PANTA Nails (Part Number 500050ND; Lot Number: E7XX) may present an insufficient depth and may not allow the engagement of the threaded part…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.8 years on median.
  • 2 of the 7 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K091788 (Newdeal Sas, 2009) has gone furthest, with 14 descendants of its own.
  • 17 other devices also cite its predicate K983942.

How does its category compare?

All HSB devices

HSB Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HSB

15in 2025

2007: 82008: 112009: 182010: 142011: 162012: 172013: 182014: 192015: 222016: 82017: 232018: 172019: 132020: 172021: 102022: 122023: 112024: 132025: 152026 (partial year): 18
2007high 23 (2017) · low 8 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HSB

106in 2025

2007: 68 days median2008: 57 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 117 days median2011: 78 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 119 days median2018: 134 days median2019: 132 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 94 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 162 days median2024: 195 days median2025: 106 days median2026 (partial year): 151 days median
2007high 195 (2024) · low 57 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HSB

18in 2025

2008: 92009: 812010: 182011: 22012: 72013: 142014: 32015: 32016: 62017: 662018: 562019: 62020: 62021: 22022: 12023: 12024: 12025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 81 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HSB

2,911in 2025

2007: 1622008: 1842009: 3342010: 4542011: 6622012: 1,0792013: 1,7732014: 1,4742015: 1,6712016: 1,9202017: 1,4472018: 3,5262019: 2,5172020: 3,2992021: 4,1112022: 2,7332023: 2,2192024: 2,8692025: 2,911
2007high 4,111 (2021) · low 162 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HSB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078680162
200811579184
2009188681334
20101411718454
201116782662
20121711271,079
201318105141,773
20141914731,474
20152211131,671
2016812461,920
201723119661,447
201817134563,526
20191313262,517
20201711263,299
2021109424,111
20221217212,733
20231116212,219
20241319512,869
202515106182,911
2026181511—

What is it indicated for?

The Newdeal Ankle Nail is intended for use in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis and treatment of trauma to the hindfoot and distal tibia. Examples include: - Post-traumatic and degenerative arthritis involving both ankle and subtalar joints - rheumatoid arthritis - revision of failed ankle arthrodesis with subtalar involvement or with insufficient talar body - revision of failed total ankle arthroplasty with subtalar intrusion - talar deficiency conditions…

Read the full statement (108 words)

The Newdeal Ankle Nail is intended for use in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis and treatment of trauma to the hindfoot and distal tibia. Examples include:

- Post-traumatic and degenerative arthritis involving both ankle and subtalar joints

- rheumatoid arthritis

- revision of failed ankle arthrodesis with subtalar involvement or with insufficient talar body

- revision of failed total ankle arthroplasty with subtalar intrusion

- talar deficiency conditions (requiring a tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis)

- avascular necrosis of the talus

- Neuroarthropathy or neuropathic ankle deformity

- severe deformity as a result of talipes equinovams, cerebral vascular accident, paralysis or other neuromuscular disease

- severe pilon fractures with trauma to the subtalar joint

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K050882: Newdeal Ankle Nail.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K050882

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026