510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2005

Adapter Cable

K050884510(k) TraditionalCleared May 19, 200542-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.3720Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Remington Medical, Inc. · DTA Tester, Pacemaker Electrode Function

Cleared on May 19, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K032613 (Peter M. Rothenberg, M.D., 2003) and 1 other predicate after a 42-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1988. It has been recalled once.

Decided
May 19, 2005
Review
42 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DTA
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K883930 (1988). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2003: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestorK883930 · Seamed Model 3300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analy · Seamed Corp. · 1988K964190 · Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analyzer · Biotronik, Inc. · 199719851990199520002005
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K964190 · Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analyzer · Biotronik, Inc. · 1997K883930 · Seamed Model 3300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analy · Seamed Corp. · 19880
  1. Root · 2 generations backK883930 Seamed Model 3300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalySeamed Corp. · 1988
  2. 1 generation backK964190 Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalyzerBiotronik, Inc. · 1997
  3. This deviceK050884 Adapter CableRemington Medical, Inc. · 2005
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K883930Seamed Model 3300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalySeamed Corp.1988—
−1K964190Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalyzerBiotronik, Inc.1997—
0 (this device)K050884Adapter CableRemington Medical, Inc.2005—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K050884, 1988–2005Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DTA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K032613Temporary Transvenous Pacemaker Placement Assist Device
Summary page 1
…r: 870.3600, 870.3630, and 870.3720 C. Identification of Legally Marketed Devices 1. Name: ERA 300 2. K Number: K032613 and K964190 3. Date Cleared: December 8, 2003 and July 10, 1997 D. Description of the Device…
Peter M. Rothenberg, M.D.2003—
*K964190Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analyzer
Summary page 1
…870.3600, 870.3630, and 870.3720 C. Identification of Legally Marketed Devices 1. Name: ERA 300 2. K Number: K032613 and K964190 3. Date Cleared: December 8, 2003 and July 10, 1997 D. Description of the Device…
Biotronik, Inc.1997—

Also cleared against K032613: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Aug 31, 2005Not classifiedZ-0124-06OtherThe vector selector has an electrical design flaw which prevents RV pacing.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 8.7 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K032613.

How does its category compare?

All DTA devices

DTA Tester, Pacemaker Electrode Function: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DTA

1in 2017

2007: 12010: 12017: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DTA

Too few DTA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DTA

No recall names DTA since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · DTA

1in 2023

2010: 12013: 22015: 12023: 1
2007high 2 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DTA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—00
20101—01
20110—00
20120—00
20130—02
20140—00
20150—01
20160—00
20171—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—01
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Model 6149 Pacing Vector Selector Cable Switch is a manually operated unit used during lead implants for PSA measurements and provides the capability to switch RV and LV tip and ring signals to five possible electrode combinations.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K050884: Adapter Cable.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K050884

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026