510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Models Era 300 and 3105 Pacing System Analyzers

K073230510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 20, 200735-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.3720

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biotronik, Inc. · DTA Tester, Pacemaker Electrode Function

Cleared on Dec 20, 2007 as substantially equivalent to K964190 (Biotronik, Inc., 1997) and 1 other predicate after a 35-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1988.

Decided
Dec 20, 2007
Review
35 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DTA
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K883930 (1988). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK883930 Seamed Model 3300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalySeamed Corp. · 1988
  2. 2 generations backK964190 Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalyzerBiotronik, Inc. · 1997
  3. 1 generation backK033613 Modification to Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalyzerBiotronik, Inc. · 2003
  4. This deviceK073230 Models Era 300 and 3105 Pacing System AnalyzersBiotronik, Inc. · 2007
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K883930Seamed Model 3300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalySeamed Corp.1988—
−2K964190Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalyzerBiotronik, Inc.1997—
−1K033613Modification to Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System AnalyzerBiotronik, Inc.2003—
0 (this device)K073230Models Era 300 and 3105 Pacing System AnalyzersBiotronik, Inc.2007—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K073230, 1988–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DTA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K964190Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analyzer
Summary page 1
…TRONIK proposes the following predicate device for the battery modification to the ERA 300 Pacing System Analyzer: *BIOTRONIK's ERA 300 Pacing System Analyzer (#K964190, cleared 07-10-97 and #K033613, cleared on 12-08-03) Pa-ge 4 of ~21 ===…
Biotronik, Inc.1997—
*K033613Modification to Era 300 Dual Chamber Pacing System Analyzer
Summary page 1
…e device for the battery modification to the ERA 300 Pacing System Analyzer: *BIOTRONIK's ERA 300 Pacing System Analyzer (#K964190, cleared 07-10-97 and #K033613, cleared on 12-08-03) Pa-ge 4 of ~21 BIOTRONIK Inc., ERA 300 Ad…
Biotronik, Inc.2003—

Also cleared against K964190: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 19 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.4 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K964190.

How does its category compare?

All DTA devices

DTA Tester, Pacemaker Electrode Function: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DTA

1in 2017

2007: 12010: 12017: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DTA

Too few DTA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DTA

No recall names DTA since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · DTA

1in 2023

2010: 12013: 22015: 12023: 1
2007high 2 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DTA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—00
20101—01
20110—00
20120—00
20130—02
20140—00
20150—01
20160—00
20171—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—01
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The ERA 300 is intended for use during invasive pacemaker procedures in the following activities: a Temporary External Pacing Provides temporary stimulation under DDD, DDI, DOO, VVI, VDD, VOO, AAI, or AOO modalities during implantable pacemaker procedures or physician evaluations. Lead Threshold Determination Determines in situ lead characteristics of impedance, capture threshold, P/R wave amplitude and P/R wave slew rate. Determines the in vivo…

Read the full statement (98 words)

The ERA 300 is intended for use during invasive pacemaker procedures in the following activities:

a Temporary External Pacing

Provides temporary stimulation under DDD, DDI, DOO, VVI, VDD, VOO, AAI, or AOO modalities during implantable pacemaker procedures or physician evaluations.

Lead Threshold Determination

Determines in situ lead characteristics of impedance, capture threshold, P/R wave amplitude and P/R wave slew rate. Determines the in vivo retrograde conduction time.

Pacemaker Function Test

Tests and analyzes the in vitro operation of external or implantable pulse generators. Determines the following parameters: pulse amplitude and width, sensitivity, refractory period, A/V delay, and rate/interval.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K073230: Models Era 300 and 3105 Pacing System Analyzers.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K073230

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026