510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Polyform Synthetic Mesh

K051245510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 17, 200532-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.3300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Proxy Biomedical, Ltd. · OTO Mesh, Surgical, Synthetic, Urogynecologic, For Apical Vaginal And Uterine Prolapse, Transabdominally Placed

Cleared on Jun 17, 2005 after a 32-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 9 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 17, 2005
Review
32 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OTO
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

9 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 descendant cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK051245 Polyform Synthetic MeshProxy Biomedical, Ltd. · 2005
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK071957 Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp · 2007 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK081048 Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit IIBoston Scientific Corp · 2008 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK091131 Pelvic Floor Repair SystemBoston Scientific · 2009
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK103426 Lite Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp · 2011
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK122459 Pinnacle Lite Pelvic Floor Repair Kit, Posterior Uphold Lite Vaginal…Boston Scientific Corporation · 2012 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 9 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2007: 12008: 12009: 12011: 12012: 22017: 22018: 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 9 · See all
  • K071957Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp · 2007 · cites it directly7descendants
  • K081048Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit IIBoston Scientific Corp · 2008 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K091131Pelvic Floor Repair SystemBoston Scientific · 2009 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K103426Lite Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp · 2011 · 2 generations on4descendants
  • K122459Pinnacle Lite Pelvic Floor Repair Kit, Posterior Uphold Lite Vaginal Support SystemBoston Scientific Corporation · 2012 · 3 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K051245Polyform Synthetic MeshProxy Biomedical, Ltd.2005—
+1K071957Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp20073
+2K081048Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit IIBoston Scientific Corp20081
+2K091131Pelvic Floor Repair SystemBoston Scientific2009—
+2K103426Lite Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp2011—
+3K122459Pinnacle Lite Pelvic Floor Repair Kit, Posterior Uphold Lite Vaginal Support…Boston Scientific Corporation20122

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
200810
200910
201110
201220
201720
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K051245, 2005–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OTO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Mersilene Mesh
Named without a submission number
—
*—Prolene Soft Mesh
Named without a submission number
—
*—Bard Mesh
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (9)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K071957Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair KitsBoston Scientific Corp20077
K171271Polyform Synthetic MeshBoston Scientific Corporation20170

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K071957 (Boston Scientific Corp, 2007) has gone furthest, with 7 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All OTO devices

OTO Mesh, Surgical, Synthetic, Urogynecologic, For Apical Vaginal And Uterine Prolapse, Transabdominally Placed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · OTO

1in 2017

2009: 12011: 12012: 72013: 42014: 12015: 22017: 1
2007high 7 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OTO

95in 2013

2012: 101 days median2013: 95 days median
2007high 101 (2012) · low 95 (2013)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OTO

No recall names OTO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OTO

79in 2025

2011: 72012: 1602013: 2,2722014: 2672015: 4482016: 1562017: 752018: 1452019: 3472020: 1532021: 2922022: 1122023: 1012024: 1132025: 79
2007high 2,272 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OTO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20091—00
20100—00
20111—07
201271010160
201349502,272
20141—0267
20152—0448
20160—0156
20171—075
20180—0145
20190—0347
20200—0153
20210—0292
20220—0112
20230—0101
20240—0113
20250—079
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Polyform™ Synthetic Mesh is indicated for tissue reinforcement and stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor via an abdominal approach, where surgical treatment is intended, either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K051245: Polyform Synthetic Mesh.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K051245

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026