510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Polyform Synthetic Mesh

K171271510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 15, 2017228-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.3300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boston Scientific Corporation · OTO Mesh, Surgical, Synthetic, Urogynecologic, For Apical Vaginal And Uterine Prolapse, Transabdominally Placed

Cleared on Dec 15, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K051245 (Proxy Biomedical, Ltd., 2005) after a 228-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2005.

Decided
Dec 15, 2017
Review
228 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OTO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K051245 (2005). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K051245 · Polyform Synthetic Mesh · Proxy Biomedical, Ltd. · 20052006200820102012201420162018
K051245 · Polyform Synthetic Mesh · Proxy Biomedical, Ltd. · 20050
  1. Root · 1 generation backK051245 Polyform Synthetic MeshProxy Biomedical, Ltd. · 2005
  2. This deviceK171271 Polyform Synthetic MeshBoston Scientific Corporation · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K051245Polyform Synthetic MeshProxy Biomedical, Ltd.2005—
0 (this device)K171271Polyform Synthetic MeshBoston Scientific Corporation2017—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K171271, 2005–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OTO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051245Polyform Synthetic Mesh
Summary page 4
…tic, Urogynecologic, For Apical Vaginal and Uterine Prolapse, Trasabdominally Placed Predicate: Polyform™ Synthetic Mesh (K051245) The predicate device has not been subject to a design related recall. E. Device Description The subject device co…
Proxy Biomedical, Ltd.2005—

Also cleared against K051245: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K051245.

How does its category compare?

All OTO devices

OTO Mesh, Surgical, Synthetic, Urogynecologic, For Apical Vaginal And Uterine Prolapse, Transabdominally Placed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OTO

1in 2017

2009: 12011: 12012: 72013: 42014: 12015: 22017: 1
2007high 7 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OTO

95in 2013

2012: 101 days median2013: 95 days median
2007high 101 (2012) · low 95 (2013)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OTO

No recall names OTO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OTO

79in 2025

2011: 72012: 1602013: 2,2722014: 2672015: 4482016: 1562017: 752018: 1452019: 3472020: 1532021: 2922022: 1122023: 1012024: 1132025: 79
2007high 2,272 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OTO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20091—00
20100—00
20111—07
201271010160
201349502,272
20141—0267
20152—0448
20160—0156
20171—075
20180—0145
20190—0347
20200—0153
20210—0292
20220—0112
20230—0101
20240—0113
20250—079
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Polyform Synthetic Mesh is indicated for tissue reinforcement and stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor via an abdominal approach, where surgical treatment is intended, either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K171271: Polyform Synthetic Mesh.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K171271

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026