510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model Abus

K052355510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 14, 200516-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

U-Systems, Inc. · IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Sep 14, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K032640 (U-Systems, Inc., 2003) and 2 other predicates after a 16-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1992. 64 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 14, 2005
Review
16 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYO
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K922470 (1992). 8 ancestors in all. 64 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 other ancestor2002: 2 other ancestors2000: 2 other ancestors2007: 1 descendant cleared2008: 3 descendants cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2022: 5 descendants cleared2026: 7 descendants cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2017: 5 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2019: 4 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2018: 6 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2020: 6 descendants cleared2023: 5 descendants cleared2025: 5 descendants cleared2024: 6 descendants clearedK922470 · Ies, Image Enhancement System · Open Mri, Inc. · 1992K993802 · Sharpview Image Enhancement System · Context Vision AB · 2000K024028 · Sharp View Image Enhancement System · Context Vision AB · 20031990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 7 descendants3 generations forward: 2 descendants4 generations forward: 4 descendants5 generations forward: 2 descendants6 generations forward: 7 descendants7 generations forward: 6 descendants8 generations forward: 9 descendants9 generations forward: 8 descendants10 generations forward: 6 descendants11 generations forward: 5 descendants12 generations forward: 1 descendant13 generations forward: 2 descendants K024028 · Sharp View Image Enhancement System · Context Vision AB · 2003K993802 · Sharpview Image Enhancement System · Context Vision AB · 2000K922470 · Ies, Image Enhancement System · Open Mri, Inc. · 19920+5+10
  1. Root · 3 generations backK922470 Ies, Image Enhancement SystemOpen Mri, Inc. · 1992
  2. 2 generations backK993802 Sharpview Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB · 2000
  3. 1 generation backK024028 Sharp View Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB · 2003
  4. This deviceK052355 Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model AbusU-Systems, Inc. · 2005
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 53 of its ownK080555 Sofia Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (Atus)Ivu Imaging Corporation · 2008
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 50 of its ownK123209 SoftvueDelphinus Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2013
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 49 of its ownK142517 SoftVueDelphinus Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2014
  8. Descendant · 4 generations on · 42 of its ownK150949 FibroScanEchosens · 2015
  9. Descendant · 5 generations on · 41 of its ownK160524 FibroScan 530 CompactEchosens · 2016

Showing 5 of 64 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2007: 12008: 32009: 12013: 12014: 22015: 12016: 22017: 52018: 62019: 42020: 62021: 42022: 52023: 52024: 62025: 52026: 7
2007high 7 (2026) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 64 · See all
  • K080555Sofia Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (Atus)Ivu Imaging Corporation · 2008 · cites it directly53descendants
  • K123209SoftvueDelphinus Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on50descendants
  • K142517SoftVueDelphinus Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on49descendants
  • K150949FibroScanEchosens · 2015 · 4 generations on42descendants
  • K160524FibroScan 530 CompactEchosens · 2016 · 5 generations on41descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K922470Ies, Image Enhancement SystemOpen Mri, Inc.1992—
−2K993802Sharpview Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB2000—
−1K024028Sharp View Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB2003—
0 (this device)K052355Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model AbusU-Systems, Inc.2005—
+1K080555Sofia Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (Atus)Ivu Imaging Corporation2008—
+2K123209SoftvueDelphinus Medical Technologies, Inc.2013—
+3K142517SoftVueDelphinus Medical Technologies, Inc.2014—
+4K150949FibroScanEchosens2015—
+5K160524FibroScan 530 CompactEchosens2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200020
200220
200310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
200830
200910
201310
201420
201510
201620
201750
201860
201940
202060
202140
202250
202350
202460
202550
202670
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K052355, 1992–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYO device

  1. #1 K243937 Accuro 3Sscore 20.5 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K032640Full Field Breast Imaging (Ffbu) Diagnostic Ultrasound System
Summary page 1
…: blawrnece~u-sys.com A. Legally Marketed Predicate Device The ABUS System modification is substantially equivalent to the sponsor's original FFBU device (K032640) as well as Siemens Antares DUS (K023720) and the ContextVision Sharp Image View (K(024028). The intended use and the tech…
U-Systems, Inc.2003—
*K023720Sonoline Antares Ultrasound System
Summary page 1
…ted Predicate Device The ABUS System modification is substantially equivalent to the sponsor's original FFBU device (K032640) as well as Siemens Antares DUS (K023720) and the ContextVision Sharp Image View (K(024028). The intended use and the technological characteristics of the m…
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.20021
*K024028Sharp View Image Enhancement System
Summary page 1
…fication is substantially equivalent to the original FFBU device (K032640) as well as Siemens Antares DUS (K023720) and the ContextVision Sharp Image View (K024028). E. PERFORMANCE DATA The ABUS System performance has been verified according to the U-Systemns process for Desi…
Context Vision AB2003—

Also cleared against K032640: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (64)

See all 64

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K080555Sofia Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (Atus)Ivu Imaging Corporation200853
K080930Modification to Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model AbusU-System, Inc.20083
K070477Orison Embrace SystemOrison Corporation20073
K141870Breast Volume NavigatorMetritrack, LLC20142
K082543Sonocine Adjunctive Breast Ultrasound System (Abu), Model 100Sonocine, Inc.20082

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • 2 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K080555 (Ivu Imaging Corporation, 2008) has gone furthest, with 53 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K032640.

How does its category compare?

All IYO devices

IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYO

7in 2025

2007: 202008: 142009: 132010: 152011: 112012: 152013: 172014: 142015: 192016: 102017: 192018: 142019: 132020: 112021: 152022: 52023: 112024: 102025: 72026 (partial year): 10
2007high 20 (2007) · low 5 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYO

171in 2025

2007: 17 days median2008: 36 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 69 days median2012: 68 days median2013: 50 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 46 days median2016: 36 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 59 days median2020: 57 days median2021: 64 days median2022: 190 days median2023: 177 days median2024: 220 days median2025: 171 days median2026 (partial year): 139 days median
2007high 220 (2024) · low 17 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYO

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 52009: 92010: 82012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 112022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2021) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYO

485in 2025

2007: 392008: 202009: 272010: 202011: 582012: 782013: 4362014: 3042015: 2682016: 2542017: 2382018: 3682019: 5372020: 4982021: 6172022: 5112023: 5272024: 6402025: 485
2007high 640 (2024) · low 20 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072017439
20081436520
20091379927
201015113820
20111169058
20121568278
201317503436
201414632304
201519461268
201610360254
201719720238
201814561368
201913591537
202011570498
2021156411617
202251901511
2023111770527
2024102200640
202571710485
2026101391—

What is it indicated for?

An ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system is intended to project a pulsed sound beam into body tissue to determine the depth or location of the tissue interfaces and to measure the duration of an acoustic pulse from the transmitter to the tissue interface and back to the receiver. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.

The device is indicated for use as an adjunct to mammography for B-mode ultrasonic imaging of a patient's breast when used with an automatic scanning linear array transducer.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K052355: Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model Abus.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K052355

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026