510(k) · Cleared
ClearedPorous Titanium Acetabular Augments
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Biomet Manufacturing Corp · KWA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained (Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component)
Cleared on Dec 6, 2005 as substantially equivalent to K001471 (Implex Corp., 2000) after a 54-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000. 54 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Dec 6, 2005
- Review
- 54 days
- Class
- Class III
- Product code
- KWA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K001471 (2000). 54 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backK001471 The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment, XX-Yyy-ZZZZImplex Corp. · 2000
- This deviceK052888 Porous Titanium Acetabular AugmentsBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2005
- Descendant · cites it directly · 53 of its ownK100391 Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 40 of its ownK143393 Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · Recalled
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 24 of its ownK172326 Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · Recalled
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 14 of its ownK173849 Triathlon Total Knee SystemStryker Orthopaedics · 2018 · Recalled
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 11 of its ownK190402 Triathlon Total Knee System-Additional ComponentsStryker Orthopaedics (Aka Howmedica Osteonics Corp.) · 2019
Showing 5 of 54 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 54 · See all- K100391Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly53descendants
- K143393Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · 2 generations on40descendants
- K172326Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee SystemStryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · 3 generations on24descendants
- K173849Triathlon Total Knee SystemStryker Orthopaedics · 2018 · 4 generations on14descendants
- K190402Triathlon Total Knee System-Additional ComponentsStryker Orthopaedics (Aka Howmedica Osteonics Corp.) · 2019 · 4 generations on11descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K001471 | The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment, XX-Yyy-ZZZZ | Implex Corp. | 2000 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K052888 | Porous Titanium Acetabular Augments | Biomet Manufacturing Corp | 2005 | — |
| +1 | K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF Cones | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| +2 | K143393 | Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2015 | 1 |
| +3 | K172326 | Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee System | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2017 | 1 |
| +4 | K173849 | Triathlon Total Knee System | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2018 | 3 |
| +4 | K190402 | Triathlon Total Knee System-Additional Components | Stryker Orthopaedics (Aka Howmedica Osteonics Corp.) | 2019 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KWA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K001471 | The Implex Hedrocel Acetabular Augment, XX-Yyy-ZZZZSummary page 1…-constrained cemented or non porous uncemented prosthesis (888.3353) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: Hedrocel® Acetabular Augment (K001471) Device Description: The acetabular augments are constructed of porous titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F 1580-95. The augments… | 2000 |
What descends from it? (54)
See all 541 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF Cones | 2010 | 53 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All KWA devicesKWA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained (Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · KWA
4in 2012
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KWA
76in 2012
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KWA
19in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · KWA
1,216in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code KWA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 8 | 74 | 0 | 213 |
| 2008 | 9 | 57 | 13 | 762 |
| 2009 | 7 | 139 | 0 | 820 |
| 2010 | 6 | 167 | 84 | 3,348 |
| 2011 | 11 | 101 | 28 | 17,737 |
| 2012 | 4 | 76 | 21 | 24,601 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 1 | 20,020 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 16,494 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 12,339 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 1 | 7,872 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 1 | 6,847 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 1 | 6,388 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 2 | 7,628 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 1 | 4,538 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 2,064 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,617 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 19 | 1,474 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,168 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,216 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Porous Titanium Acetabular Augments are indicated for cemented or non-cemented use in cases of: 1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. 2. Rheumatoid arthritis. 3. Correction of functional deformity. 4. Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques. 5. Revision of previously failed total…
Read the full statement (133 words)
The Porous Titanium Acetabular Augments are indicated for cemented or non-cemented use in cases of:
1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.
2. Rheumatoid arthritis.
3. Correction of functional deformity.
4. Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques.
5. Revision of previously failed total hip arthroplasty.
The porous titanium augments are intended to provide the orthopedic surgeon with a prosthetic alternative to structural allograft in cases of segmental deficiencies.
The porous titanium acetabular augment is affixed to the mating acetabular cup using bone cement. The assembled porous titanium augment/acetabular construct is intended for cemented or uncemented use.
The porous titanium acetabular augments are intended for general use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary and/or secondary revision surgery.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K052888 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K052888: Porous Titanium Acetabular Augments.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K052888
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026