510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ergoselect 100 K/P, Ergoselect 200 K/P

K053078510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 27, 2006176-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5360

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ergoline GmbH · ISD Exerciser, Measuring

Cleared on Apr 27, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K851097 (Lode Corp., 1985) after a 176-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1985. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Apr 27, 2006
Review
176 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ISD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K851097 (1985). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant clearedK851097 · Lode Model Corival Ergometer · Lode Corp. · 19851990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K851097 · Lode Model Corival Ergometer · Lode Corp. · 19850
  1. Root · 1 generation backK851097 Lode Model Corival ErgometerLode Corp. · 1985
  2. This deviceK053078 Ergoselect 100 K/P, Ergoselect 200 K/PErgoline GmbH · 2006
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK112121 Ergoselect/GEErgoline GmbH · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K112121Ergoselect/GEErgoline GmbH · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K851097Lode Model Corival ErgometerLode Corp.1985—
0 (this device)K053078Ergoselect 100 K/P, Ergoselect 200 K/PErgoline GmbH2006—
+1K112121Ergoselect/GEErgoline GmbH2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K053078, 1985–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ISD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K851097Lode Model Corival Ergometer
Summary page 1
…100 K/P; Ergoselect 200 K/P Common name:Ergometer Classification: 890.5360 3.) Substantial Equivalence: Substantial Equivalence is claimed to the following device K851097 4.) Description of device Physiotherapy in redevelopment of muscles for restoration of motion to joints or for use as an adjunc…
Lode Corp.1985—

Also cleared against K851097: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K112121Ergoselect/GEErgoline GmbH20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K112121 (Ergoline GmbH, 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K851097.

How does its category compare?

All ISD devices

ISD Exerciser, Measuring: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ISD

1in 2020

2008: 12012: 12015: 12019: 12020: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ISD

Too few ISD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · ISD

1in 2013

2013: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ISD

2in 2025

2009: 12012: 12013: 12015: 12017: 12018: 22019: 12021: 12023: 42025: 2
2007high 4 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ISD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20081—00
20090—01
20100—00
20110—00
20121—01
20130—11
20140—00
20151—01
20160—00
20170—01
20180—02
20191—01
20201—00
20210—01
20220—00
20230—04
20240—00
20250—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Physiotherapy in redevelopment of muscles for restoration of motion to joints or for use as an adjunct

treatment for obesity.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K053078: Ergoselect 100 K/P, Ergoselect 200 K/P.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K053078

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026