510(k) · Cleared
ClearedColumbus Ultra Congruent (UC) Tibial Insert/Gliding Surface
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Aesculap, Inc. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer
Cleared on May 17, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K022672 (Aesculap, Inc., 2002) and 2 other predicates after a 146-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1992.
- Decided
- May 17, 2006
- Review
- 146 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JWH
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K915192 (1992). 16 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 4 generations backK915192 7000 Series Modular Tibial ComponentsOsteonics Corp. · 1992
- 3 generations backK994128 Scorpio Total Stablizer (TS) Total Knee SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2000 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK021313 Search Evolution Total Knee SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2002
- 1 generation backK022672 Columbus Total Knee System (CR)Aesculap, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
- This deviceK053579 Columbus Ultra Congruent (UC) Tibial Insert/Gliding SurfaceAesculap, Inc. · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −4 | K915192 | 7000 Series Modular Tibial Components | Osteonics Corp. | 1992 | — |
| −3 | K994128 | Scorpio Total Stablizer (TS) Total Knee System | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | 2000 | 8 |
| −2 | K021313 | Search Evolution Total Knee System | Aesculap, Inc. | 2002 | — |
| −1 | K022672 | Columbus Total Knee System (CR) | Aesculap, Inc. | 2002 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K053579 | Columbus Ultra Congruent (UC) Tibial Insert/Gliding Surface | Aesculap, Inc. | 2006 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 1 | 0 |
| 1993 | 2 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 2 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device
- #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K022672 | Columbus Total Knee System (CR)Summary page 1…the Columbus Total Knee System is a line extension of the standard and deep dish tibial inserts that were cleared as components of Aesculap's Columbus Total Knee System (K022672 and K023788). It is also substantially equivalent to the ultra congruent inserts that were cleared for the VKS Knee System (K0222… | 2002 |
| * | K023788 | Columbus (CR) Total Knee SystemSummary page 1…Total Knee System is a line extension of the standard and deep dish tibial inserts that were cleared as components of Aesculap's Columbus Total Knee System (K022672 and K023788). It is also substantially equivalent to the ultra congruent inserts that were cleared for the VKS Knee System (K022204). DEVICE… | 2002 |
| * | K022204 | VKS Knee SystemSummary page 1…esculap's Columbus Total Knee System (K022672 and K023788). It is also substantially equivalent to the ultra congruent inserts that were cleared for the VKS Knee System (K022204). DEVICE DESCRIPTION The Ultra Congruent Tibial Insert is a gliding surface for the Columbus Total Knee System made from UHMWPE.… | 2002 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.5 years on median.
- 9 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 6 other devices also cite its predicate K022672.
How does its category compare?
All JWH devicesJWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JWH
20in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JWH
55in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JWH
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JWH
9,306in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 18 | 74 | 14 | 1,305 |
| 2008 | 17 | 81 | 10 | 1,483 |
| 2009 | 11 | 168 | 109 | 1,870 |
| 2010 | 19 | 85 | 32 | 3,286 |
| 2011 | 25 | 87 | 27 | 5,133 |
| 2012 | 33 | 85 | 85 | 5,203 |
| 2013 | 31 | 128 | 31 | 6,135 |
| 2014 | 33 | 98 | 13 | 6,722 |
| 2015 | 27 | 87 | 11 | 6,881 |
| 2016 | 18 | 88 | 17 | 7,586 |
| 2017 | 25 | 118 | 61 | 12,263 |
| 2018 | 25 | 90 | 14 | 14,071 |
| 2019 | 28 | 133 | 5 | 14,987 |
| 2020 | 22 | 59 | 2 | 12,592 |
| 2021 | 24 | 61 | 8 | 9,408 |
| 2022 | 17 | 56 | 12 | 8,364 |
| 2023 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 8,947 |
| 2024 | 19 | 89 | 7 | 10,828 |
| 2025 | 20 | 55 | 2 | 9,306 |
| 2026 | 12 | 63 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Columbus (CR) Total Knee System is indicated for use in reconstruction of the diseased knee joint caused by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, the need to revise failed arthroplasties or osteotomies where pain, deformity or dysfunction persist, and for patients suffering from correctable valgus or varus deformity and moderate flexion contracture.
The Columbus Knee (CR) is designed for use with bone cement.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K053579 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K053579: Columbus Ultra Congruent (UC) Tibial Insert/Gliding Surface.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K053579
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026