510(k) · Cleared
ClearedFiber-Metal Post
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Foremost Dental, LLC · ELR Post, Root Canal
Cleared on Mar 30, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K012354 (Danville Materials, Inc., 2001) and 2 other predicates after a 79-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1995.
- Decided
- Mar 30, 2006
- Review
- 79 days
- Class
- Class I
- Product code
- ELR
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K945370 (1995). 10 ancestors in all, the oldest K913040 (1991). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 | K945370 | C-POST | Bisco, Inc. | 1995 | — |
| −2 | K012354 | Snowpost, Snowlight | Danville Materials, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −1 | K020431 | Fibiocore | Est. Anthogyr | 2002 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K060075 | Fiber-Metal Post | Foremost Dental, LLC | 2006 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 1 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 2 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in ELR? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K012354 | Snowpost, SnowlightSummary page 1…to several currently marketed root canal posts: Product Name 51 0(k) 510(k) Sponsor Snowpost IK01 2354 Danville Materials, Inc. everStick TM Post K030820 Stick Tech, Ltd. Fibiocore… | 2001 |
| * | K030820 | Everstick PostSummary page 1…51 0(k) 510(k) Sponsor Snowpost IK01 2354 Danville Materials, Inc. everStick TM Post K030820 Stick Tech, Ltd. Fibiocore K020431 Anthogyr Indications for Use: The Fiber-Metal Po… | 2003 |
| * | K020431 | FibiocoreSummary page 1…IK01 2354 Danville Materials, Inc. everStick TM Post K030820 Stick Tech, Ltd. Fibiocore K020431 Anthogyr Indications for Use: The Fiber-Metal Post is indicated for use as a root canal post. The post is cemented into the… | 2002 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.7 years on median.
- None of the 10 ancestors has a recall.
- 1 other device also cites its predicate K012354.
How does its category compare?
All ELR devicesELR Post, Root Canal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · ELR
FDA has decided no ELR device since 2007.
Median 510(k) review, days · ELR
Too few ELR 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · ELR
1in 2018
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · ELR
1in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code ELR, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 1 | 3 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 30 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 1 | 5 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 20 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Fiber-Metal Post is indicated for use as a root canal post. The post is cemented into the prepared root canal of a tooth to support a permanent restoration.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K060075 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K060075: Fiber-Metal Post.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060075
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026