510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Mediport

K060210510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 10, 200614-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Maxant Technologies, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Feb 10, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K051521 (Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc., 2005) and 5 other predicates after a 14-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1991.

Decided
Feb 10, 2006
Review
14 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
6

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K913475 (1991). 48 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2005: 7 other ancestors2004: 9 other ancestors2003: 4 other ancestors2002: 3 other ancestors2001: 3 other ancestors2000: 2 other ancestors1999: 1 other ancestor1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 3 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestor1994: 2 other ancestors1992: 2 other ancestors1995: 2 other ancestors1993: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestorK913475 · Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Device · GE Medical Systems · 1991K960265 · Advantage Windows with Functool Option · GE Medical Systems · 1996 · recalledK971965 · Philips Easyvision · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998K022292 · Impax Diagnostic Display Station,Impax Clinical Review Station,Impax for Cardiology Clinical Review Satation,Impax Ortho · Agfa Corp. · 2002 · recalledK040344 · Impax OT3000 Orthopedic Workstation · Agfa Corp. · 2004K042867 · Philips Orthopaedic Applications · Philips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 20041990199520002005
  1. Root · 6 generations backK913475 Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic DeviceGE Medical Systems · 1991
  2. 5 generations backK960265 Advantage Windows with Functool OptionGE Medical Systems · 1996 · Recalled
  3. 4 generations backK971965 Philips EasyvisionPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998
  4. 3 generations backK022292 Impax Diagnostic Display Station,Impax Clinical Review Station,Impax…Agfa Corp. · 2002 · Recalled
  5. 2 generations backK040344 Impax OT3000 Orthopedic WorkstationAgfa Corp. · 2004
  6. 1 generation backK042867 Philips Orthopaedic ApplicationsPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 2004
  7. This deviceK060210 MediportMaxant Technologies, Inc. · 2006
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K913475Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic DeviceGE Medical Systems1991—
−5K960265Advantage Windows with Functool OptionGE Medical Systems19961
−4K971965Philips EasyvisionPhilips Medical Systems, Inc.1998—
−3K022292Impax Diagnostic Display Station,Impax Clinical Review Station,Impax for…Agfa Corp.20029
−2K040344Impax OT3000 Orthopedic WorkstationAgfa Corp.2004—
−1K042867Philips Orthopaedic ApplicationsPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc.2004—
0 (this device)K060210MediportMaxant Technologies, Inc.2006—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199220
199310
199420
199520
199610
199730
199810
199910
200020
200130
200230
200340
200490
200570
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060210, 1991–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051521Regius RS-1000, Medical Image Processing Workstation
Summary page 2
…of equivalents in order to be sure of covering all. a. Konica Minolta Medical Graphic, Inc. product REGIUS RS-1000. K051521 Paragraph 11 shows its hardware as Computer "Off the shelf" ME…
Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc.2005—
*K052461Syngo Imaging Version V20A
Summary page 2
…ell as this predicate device. This device in not quali fied for use for mammographic purposes. b. Siemens AG, Medical Solutions - K052461 Device Description "The system is a "hardware independent" solution to be distributed…
Siemens AG Medical Solutions20053
*K042867Philips Orthopaedic Applications
Summary page 3
…as well as this predicate device. This device in not qualified for use for mammographic purposes. c. Phillips Orthopaedic Applications - K042867 System Description "The Phillips Orthopaedic Application software runs "off the shelf"…
Philips Medical Systems North America, Inc.2004—
*K05048520.8-Inch (53CM) Monochrome LCD Monitor MDL2110A (ME351I), (DV3MM-HB)
Summary page 3
…ivalent to and performs as well as this predicate device. This device in not qualified for use for mammographic purposes. d. Totoku K050485, K050619 20.8" Gray scale or color 3MP monitor with DICOM calibration. Maxant is of the…
Totoku Electric Co., Ltd.2005—
*K05061920.8-Inch (53CM) Color LCD Monitor, Models CDL2112A, CCL350I & DV3MC-HB
Summary page 3
…o and performs as well as this predicate device. This device in not qualified for use for mammographic purposes. d. Totoku K050485, K050619 20.8" Gray scale or color 3MP monitor with DICOM calibration. Maxant is of the opinion t…
Totoku Electric Co., Ltd.2005—
*K052276Nio 2MP-20 and E-2620 S
Summary page 3
…plies that meet medical standards. This device in not qualified for use for mammographic purposes. e. BarcoView K052276 20. 1" Gray scale 2MP monitor with DICOM calibration. Maxant is of the opinion that the M…
Barcoview2005—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 11 of the 48 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The MEDIPORT is a medical grade device to be used as a platform for PACS software or DICOM viewer software. It is intended for use in all Hospital environments (OR, ER etc.) as well as Physicians' Offices and Clinical Laboratories.

In light of the fact that MEDIPORT is a high performance computer it may also be used to access patient records or perform other functions that may be required.

This device in not qualified or intended for use for mammographic purposes.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060210: Mediport.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060210

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026