510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2020Vanguard Removable Molded Poly Tibia
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Biomet Manufacturing Corp · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer
Cleared on May 25, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K991753 (Biomet, Inc., 1999) and 2 other predicates after an 87-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1992. 16 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 3 times.
- Decided
- May 25, 2006
- Review
- 87 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JWH
- Recalls
- 3
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K915132 (1992). 5 ancestors in all. 16 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- Root · 2 generations backK915132 MCK Maximum Congruent Knee) Knee SystemBiomet, Inc. · 1992 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK023546 Maxim Accel Knee SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
- This deviceK060525 Vanguard Removable Molded Poly TibiaBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2006
- Descendant · cites it directly · 9 of its ownK102580 Vanguard Removable Molded Poly TibiaBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2011
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK122160 Vanguard XP Knee SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2013 · Recalled
- Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK171054 Biomet Knee Joint Replacement ProsthesesBiomet, Inc. · 2017 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK181947 Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2018 · Recalled
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK132873 Vanguard XP Knee SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
Showing 5 of 16 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 16 · See all- K102580Vanguard Removable Molded Poly TibiaBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2011 · cites it directly9descendants
- K122160Vanguard XP Knee SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2013 · 2 generations on6descendants
- K171054Biomet Knee Joint Replacement ProsthesesBiomet, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly5descendants
- K181947Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2018 · 2 generations on4descendants
- K132873Vanguard XP Knee SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2013 · 3 generations on3descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | K915132 | MCK Maximum Congruent Knee) Knee System | Biomet, Inc. | 1992 | 6 |
| −1 | K023546 | Maxim Accel Knee System | Biomet, Inc. | 2003 | 13 |
| 0 (this device) | K060525 | Vanguard Removable Molded Poly Tibia | Biomet Manufacturing Corp | 2006 | — |
| +1 | K102580 | Vanguard Removable Molded Poly Tibia | Biomet Manufacturing Corp | 2011 | — |
| +2 | K122160 | Vanguard XP Knee System | Biomet Manufacturing Corp | 2013 | 12 |
| +1 | K171054 | Biomet Knee Joint Replacement Prostheses | Biomet, Inc. | 2017 | 4 |
| +2 | K181947 | Persona Revision Knee System | Zimmer, Inc. | 2018 | 1 |
| +3 | K132873 | Vanguard XP Knee System | Biomet, Inc. | 2013 | 22 |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device
- #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K991753 | Maxim Removable Molded Poly TibiaSummary page 1…polymer/metal/polymer (888.3560) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Maxim® Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia (Pop-Top) - K991753 and K984623 (Biomet, Inc.): Vanguard TM System- K023546 (Biomet, Inc.) Device Description: Vanguard Removable Molded Polyethylen… | 1999 |
| * | K984623 | Maxim Removable Molded Poly TibiaSummary page 1…olymer/metal/polymer (888.3560) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Maxim® Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia (Pop-Top) - K991753 and K984623 (Biomet, Inc.): Vanguard TM System- K023546 (Biomet, Inc.) Device Description: Vanguard Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia is i… | 1999 |
| * | K023546 | Maxim Accel Knee SystemSummary page 1…keted Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Maxim® Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia (Pop-Top) - K991753 and K984623 (Biomet, Inc.): Vanguard TM System- K023546 (Biomet, Inc.) Device Description: Vanguard Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia is intended to replace… | 2003 |
What descends from it? (16)
See all 162 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2020 | Class II | Z-2152-2020 | Process control | Potential presence of elevated endotoxin levels that exceed the specification limit |
| Apr 17, 2020 | Class II | Z-2151-2020 | Process control | Potential presence of elevated endotoxin levels that exceed the specification limit |
| Feb 17, 2017 | Class II | Z-1861-2017 | Process design | Endotoxin levels higher than process maximum limits were discovered in the identified polyethylene components. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 14 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10.9 years on median.
- 2 of the 5 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K102580 (Biomet Manufacturing Corp, 2011) has gone furthest, with 9 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All JWH devicesJWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JWH
20in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JWH
55in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JWH
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JWH
9,306in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 18 | 74 | 14 | 1,305 |
| 2008 | 17 | 81 | 10 | 1,483 |
| 2009 | 11 | 168 | 109 | 1,870 |
| 2010 | 19 | 85 | 32 | 3,286 |
| 2011 | 25 | 87 | 27 | 5,133 |
| 2012 | 33 | 85 | 85 | 5,203 |
| 2013 | 31 | 128 | 31 | 6,135 |
| 2014 | 33 | 98 | 13 | 6,722 |
| 2015 | 27 | 87 | 11 | 6,881 |
| 2016 | 18 | 88 | 17 | 7,586 |
| 2017 | 25 | 118 | 61 | 12,263 |
| 2018 | 25 | 90 | 14 | 14,071 |
| 2019 | 28 | 133 | 5 | 14,987 |
| 2020 | 22 | 59 | 2 | 12,592 |
| 2021 | 24 | 61 | 8 | 9,408 |
| 2022 | 17 | 56 | 12 | 8,364 |
| 2023 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 8,947 |
| 2024 | 19 | 89 | 7 | 10,828 |
| 2025 | 20 | 55 | 2 | 9,306 |
| 2026 | 12 | 63 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
1. Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved.
2. Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity.
3. Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous joint replacement procedure.
The device is a single use implant intended for use with bone cement.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K060525 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K060525: Vanguard Removable Molded Poly Tibia.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060525
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026