510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Pulsion Picco Plus, Model 8100

K060898510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 25, 2006113-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1435

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pulsion Medical Systems AG · DXG Computer, Diagnostic, Pre-Programmed, Single-Function

Cleared on Jul 25, 2006 after a 113-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 25, 2006
Review
113 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DXG
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

3 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2014: 2 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK060898 Pulsion Picco Plus, Model 8100Pulsion Medical Systems AG · 2006
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK140017 Transonic HCM 102 SystemTransonic Systems, Inc. · 2014
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK132528 E-Picco Continuous Cardiac Output Module and AccessoriesGE Healthcare Finland Oy · 2014
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK073113 Infinity Picco Pod, Model MS16734Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. · 2008

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K140017Transonic HCM 102 SystemTransonic Systems, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K132528E-Picco Continuous Cardiac Output Module and AccessoriesGE Healthcare Finland Oy · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K073113Infinity Picco Pod, Model MS16734Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. · 2008 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K060898Pulsion Picco Plus, Model 8100Pulsion Medical Systems AG2006—
+1K140017Transonic HCM 102 SystemTransonic Systems, Inc.2014—
+1K132528E-Picco Continuous Cardiac Output Module and AccessoriesGE Healthcare Finland Oy2014—
+1K073113Infinity Picco Pod, Model MS16734Draeger Medical Systems, Inc.2008—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200810
201420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K060898, 2006–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DXG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DXG device

  1. #1 K253092 Argos Infinity (Rev. 1.0)score 11.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (3)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K140017Transonic HCM 102 SystemTransonic Systems, Inc.20140
K132528E-Picco Continuous Cardiac Output Module and AccessoriesGE Healthcare Finland Oy20140
K073113Infinity Picco Pod, Model MS16734Draeger Medical Systems, Inc.20080

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K140017 (Transonic Systems, Inc., 2014) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DXG devices

DXG Computer, Diagnostic, Pre-Programmed, Single-Function: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DXG

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 52010: 42011: 32012: 22013: 32014: 62015: 12016: 12017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12021: 12023: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2014) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DXG

290in 2014

2008: 118 days median2010: 282 days median2011: 104 days median2013: 236 days median2014: 290 days median
2007high 290 (2014) · low 104 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DXG

2in 2020

2007: 12008: 12009: 62010: 12020: 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DXG

8in 2025

2007: 432008: 372009: 82010: 172011: 72012: 292013: 232014: 442015: 342016: 672017: 622018: 832019: 812020: 492021: 292022: 442023: 122024: 212025: 8
2007high 83 (2018) · low 7 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DXG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20085118137
20090—68
20104282117
2011310407
20122—029
20133236023
20146290044
20151—034
20161—067
20171—062
20182—083
20192—081
20201—249
20211—029
20220—044
20231—012
20240—021
20251—08
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The PULSION PiCCO Plus is intended for determination and monitoring of cardiopulmonary and circulatory variables. Cardiac output is determined both continuously through pulse contour analysis and intermittently through thermodilution technique. In addition, the PiCCO Plus measures heart rate, systolic, and diastolic and derives mean arterial pressure. Analysis of thermodilution curve in terms of mean transit time and downslope time is used for determination of intravascular and extravascular fluid volumes. If a patient's weight and height are entered, the PiCCO Plus presents the derived parameters indexed to body surface area.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K060898: Pulsion Picco Plus, Model 8100.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K060898

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026