510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

PulsioFlex Monitoring System with ProAQT Sensor

K192169510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 30, 2020265-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1435

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pulsion Medical Systems SE · DXG Computer, Diagnostic, Pre-Programmed, Single-Function

Cleared on Apr 30, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K172259 (Pulsion Medical Systems SE, 2018) after a 265-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2012.

Decided
Apr 30, 2020
Review
265 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DXG
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K122121 (2012). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK122121 Pulsioflex Monitoring System with Picco ModulePulsion Medical Systems SE · 2012
  2. 1 generation backK172259 PulsioFlex Monitoring SystemPulsion Medical Systems SE · 2018 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK192169 PulsioFlex Monitoring System with ProAQT SensorPulsion Medical Systems SE · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K122121Pulsioflex Monitoring System with Picco ModulePulsion Medical Systems SE2012—
−1K172259PulsioFlex Monitoring SystemPulsion Medical Systems SE20181
0 (this device)K192169PulsioFlex Monitoring System with ProAQT SensorPulsion Medical Systems SE2020—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K192169, 2012–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DXG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DXG device

  1. #1 K253092 Argos Infinity (Rev. 1.0)score 11.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K172259PulsioFlex Monitoring System
Summary page 4
…computer. Classification According to 21 CFR 870.1435 the device classification is Class II, Product code DXG. Predicate Device K172259, PulsioFlex Monitoring System…
Pulsion Medical Systems SE20181

Also cleared against K172259: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 5.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K172259.

How does its category compare?

All DXG devices

DXG Computer, Diagnostic, Pre-Programmed, Single-Function: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DXG

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 52010: 42011: 32012: 22013: 32014: 62015: 12016: 12017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12021: 12023: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2014) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DXG

290in 2014

2008: 118 days median2010: 282 days median2011: 104 days median2013: 236 days median2014: 290 days median
2007high 290 (2014) · low 104 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DXG

2in 2020

2007: 12008: 12009: 62010: 12020: 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DXG

8in 2025

2007: 432008: 372009: 82010: 172011: 72012: 292013: 232014: 442015: 342016: 672017: 622018: 832019: 812020: 492021: 292022: 442023: 122024: 212025: 8
2007high 83 (2018) · low 7 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DXG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20085118137
20090—68
20104282117
2011310407
20122—029
20133236023
20146290044
20151—034
20161—067
20171—062
20182—083
20192—081
20201—249
20211—029
20220—044
20231—012
20240—021
20251—08
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The PulsioFlex Monitoring System is a diagnostic aid for the measurement and monitoring of blood pressure, cardiopulmonary, circulatory and organ function variables. The PulsioFlex Monitoring System is indicated in patients where cardiovascular and circulatory volume status monitoring is necessary. If a patient’s biometric data are entered, the PulsioFlex Monitor presents the derived parameters indexed. - With the PiCCO Module cardiac output is…

Read the full statement (157 words)

The PulsioFlex Monitoring System is a diagnostic aid for the measurement and monitoring of blood pressure, cardiopulmonary, circulatory and organ function variables. The PulsioFlex Monitoring System is indicated in patients where cardiovascular and circulatory volume status monitoring is necessary. If a patient’s biometric data are entered, the PulsioFlex Monitor presents the derived parameters indexed.

- With the PiCCO Module cardiac output is determined both continuously through pulse contour analysis and intermittently through thermodilution technique. Both are used for the determination of other derived parameters.

- With the CeVOX oximetry module connected to a compatible oximetry probe, the PulsioFlex Monitoring System measures continuous venous oxygen saturation to assess oxygen delivery and consumption.

- With the ProAQT Sensor, the PulsioFlex Monitoring System uses arterial pulse contour analysis for continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

The use of the PulsioFlex Monitoring System is indicated in patients where cardiovascular and organ monitoring is useful. This includes patients in surgical, medical, and other hospital units.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K192169: PulsioFlex Monitoring System with ProAQT Sensor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K192169

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026