510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cage

K061226510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 2, 200692-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer, Inc. · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Aug 2, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K960678 (Intermedics Orthopedics, 1996) after a 92-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1995. 4 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Aug 2, 2006
Review
92 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K953578 (1995). 4 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2020: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant clearedK953578 · Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring · Intermedics Orthopedics · 1995K960678 · Burch/Schneider Reinforcement Cage · Intermedics Orthopedics · 19961995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K960678 · Burch/Schneider Reinforcement Cage · Intermedics Orthopedics · 1996K953578 · Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring · Intermedics Orthopedics · 19950
  1. Root · 2 generations backK953578 Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement RingIntermedics Orthopedics · 1995
  2. 1 generation backK960678 Burch/Schneider Reinforcement CageIntermedics Orthopedics · 1996
  3. This deviceK061226 Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System CageZimmer, Inc. · 2006
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK113296 ZMR Hip System KWZ-Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented or…Zimmer, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK200823 Zimmer, Inc. Hip Joint Prostheses MR Labeling IZimmer, Inc. · 2020 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK253630 Mpact 3D Metal FoamMedacta International S.A. · 2026
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK250834 Zimmer Biomet Ceramic Heads (22.2mm diameter)Zimmer Biomet · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K113296ZMR Hip System KWZ-Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented or Uncemented, Metal/PolymerZimmer, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K200823Zimmer, Inc. Hip Joint Prostheses MR Labeling IZimmer, Inc. · 2020 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K253630Mpact 3D Metal FoamMedacta International S.A. · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K250834Zimmer Biomet Ceramic Heads (22.2mm diameter)Zimmer Biomet · 2025 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K953578Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement RingIntermedics Orthopedics1995—
−1K960678Burch/Schneider Reinforcement CageIntermedics Orthopedics1996—
0 (this device)K061226Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System CageZimmer, Inc.2006—
+1K113296ZMR Hip System KWZ-Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented or Uncemented…Zimmer, Inc.2012—
+1K200823Zimmer, Inc. Hip Joint Prostheses MR Labeling IZimmer, Inc.20201
+1K253630Mpact 3D Metal FoamMedacta International S.A.2026—
+2K250834Zimmer Biomet Ceramic Heads (22.2mm diameter)Zimmer Biomet2025—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
202010
202510
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K061226, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960678Burch/Schneider Reinforcement Cage
Summary page 1
…Porous, lincemented and Reference: 2! CFR § 888.3358 Predicate Device: BurchlzSchneiderTm Reinforcement Cage, K960678, cleared May 3, 1996, manufactured by Zimmer GmbH (former…
Intermedics Orthopedics1996—

Also cleared against K960678: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (4)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K113296ZMR Hip System KWZ-Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented or Uncemented, Metal/PolymerZimmer, Inc.20122
K200823Zimmer, Inc. Hip Joint Prostheses MR Labeling IZimmer, Inc.20201
K253630Mpact 3D Metal FoamMedacta International S.A.20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10.2 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K113296 (Zimmer, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K960678.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

This device is intended for cemented use only as part of a layered construct and is indicated for patients with conditions of, but not limited to, acetabular dysplasia, osteoporosis, protrusio acetabuli. cystic acetabular roof: reconstruction in cases of defects after fracture, acetabular loosening, tumors or revision surgery, advanced joint destruction resulting from degenerative, post-traumatic, or rheumatoid arthritis, and failed previous surgery, e.g., osteosynthesis.joint reconstruction. arthrodesis. herni-arthroplasty. or total hip replacement.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K061226: Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061226

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026