510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Vitek 2 Ast-YS Fluconazole

K061945510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 19, 200671-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.1640

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

bioMerieux, Inc. · NGZ Susceptibility Test Plate, Antifungal

Cleared on Sep 19, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K991810 (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc., 2001) after a 71-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2001. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Sep 19, 2006
Review
71 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NGZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K991810 (2001). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant clearedK991810 · Modification to Sensititre Yeastone Mic Susceptibility Test · Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc. · 2001200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K991810 · Modification to Sensititre Yeastone Mic Susceptibility Test · Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc. · 20010
  1. Root · 1 generation backK991810 Modification to Sensititre Yeastone Mic Susceptibility TestTrek Diagnostic Systems, Inc. · 2001
  2. This deviceK061945 Vitek 2 Ast-YS FluconazolebioMerieux, Inc. · 2006
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK101566 Vitek 2 Yeast CaspofunginbioMerieux, Inc. · 2010

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K101566Vitek 2 Yeast CaspofunginbioMerieux, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K991810Modification to Sensititre Yeastone Mic Susceptibility TestTrek Diagnostic Systems, Inc.2001—
0 (this device)K061945Vitek 2 Ast-YS FluconazolebioMerieux, Inc.2006—
+1K101566Vitek 2 Yeast CaspofunginbioMerieux, Inc.2010—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K061945, 2001–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NGZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NGZ device

  1. #1 K232963 VITEK 2 AST-Yeast Anidulafungin (<= 0.015 - >=…score 8.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K991810Modification to Sensititre Yeastone Mic Susceptibility Test
Summary page 1
…Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Common Name: VITEK 2 AST-YS Fluconazole C. Predicate Device: YEASTONE®(K0991810) Fluconazole D. 510(k) Summary: VITEe#2 Yeast Fluconazole is designed for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida…
Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc.2001—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K101566Vitek 2 Yeast CaspofunginbioMerieux, Inc.20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K101566 (bioMerieux, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NGZ devices

NGZ Susceptibility Test Plate, Antifungal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NGZ

1in 2025

2009: 32010: 22014: 32016: 22018: 12021: 12023: 32024: 22025: 1
2007high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NGZ

204in 2023

2009: 326 days median2014: 232 days median2023: 204 days median
2007high 326 (2009) · low 204 (2023)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NGZ

2in 2022

2022: 2
2007high 2 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NGZ

1in 2024

2011: 12014: 12015: 12016: 92017: 162018: 102021: 82022: 32023: 32024: 1
2007high 16 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NGZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
2009332600
20102—00
20110—01
20120—00
20130—00
2014323201
20150—01
20162—09
20170—016
20181—010
20190—00
20200—00
20211—08
20220—23
2023320403
20242—01
20251—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

VITEK® 2 Yeast Fluconazole is designed for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species. VITEK 2 Yeast Fluconazole is a quantitative test. It is intended for use with the VITEK 2 System as a laboratory aid in the determination of in vitro susceptibility to antifungal agents.

The VITEK® 2 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) is intended to be used with the VITEK® 2 System for the automated quantitative or qualitative susceptibility testing of isolated colonies for the most clinically significant aerobic gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae,S. pneumoniae and clinically significant yeast.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K061945: Vitek 2 Ast-YS Fluconazole.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061945

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026