510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Crystal

K073351510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 24, 200856-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spinal Elements, Inc. · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Jan 24, 2008 after a 56-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 of the 1,155 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 1,154 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 24, 2008
Review
56 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1,154 later devices descend from it, 27 citing it directly. 1 of the 1,155 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2019: 96 descendants cleared2015: 50 descendants cleared2011: 18 descendants cleared2017: 105 descendants cleared2014: 50 descendants cleared2016: 64 descendants cleared2009: 4 descendants cleared2010: 5 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2013: 24 descendants cleared2012: 20 descendants cleared2023: 103 descendants cleared2018: 90 descendants cleared2020: 97 descendants cleared2021: 86 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12026: 77 descendants cleared2024: 102 descendants cleared2022: 81 descendants cleared2025: 81 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK073351 CrystalSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 775 of its ownK112036 Calix PC Spinal Implant SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2011
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 701 of its ownK090064 Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine · 2009 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 694 of its ownK110632 Lucent or Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2012 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 615 of its ownK122967 LucentSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2013
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 590 of its ownK140319 Coroent TI-C SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014

Showing 5 of 1,154 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2008: 12009: 42010: 52011: 182012: 202013: 242014: 502015: 502016: 642017: 1052018: 902019: 962020: 972021: 862022: 812023: 1032024: 1022025: 812026: 77
2008high 105 (2017) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 1,154 · See all
  • K112036Calix PC Spinal Implant SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly775descendants
  • K090064Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine · 2009 · cites it directly701descendants
  • K110632Lucent or Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on694descendants
  • K122967LucentSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2013 · 3 generations on615descendants
  • K140319Coroent TI-C SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on590descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K073351CrystalSpinal Elements, Inc.2008—
+1K112036Calix PC Spinal Implant SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc.2011—
+1K090064Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine20091
+2K110632Lucent or Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc.20121
+3K122967LucentSpinal Elements, Inc.2013—
+3K140319Coroent TI-C SystemNuvasive, Inc.2014—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200810
200940
201050
2011180
2012200
2013240
2014500
2015500
2016640
20171050
2018900
2019960
2020970
2021861
2022810
20231030
20241020
2025810
2026770
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K073351, 2008–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (1,154)

See all 1,154

27 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K112036Calix PC Spinal Implant SystemX-Spine Systems, Inc.2011775
K090064Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine2009701
K083311Aesculap Cespace Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemAesculap Implant Systems, Inc.2009554
K103033Trabecular Metal Fusion Device Model 06-101-Xxxxx, 06-102-Xxxxx and 08-100-XxxxxZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology2011505
K110733Daytona Anterior Cervical CageSpinenet, LLC2011481
K083118Spinal Usa Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceSpinal USA2009458
K080971Spinesmith Cimplicity Spinal SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P.2008406
K093093Small Plateau Spacer SystemLife Spine2010393
K102606Avs Anchor-C Cervical Cage SystemStryker Spine2011384
K101812Construx Mini Peek Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc.2010291

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 7 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K112036 (X-Spine Systems, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 775 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the Crystal device is intended for use in the thoracic and/or thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body resected or excised (i.e., partial or total vertebrectomy procedures) due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture). This device is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine (i.e.…

Read the full statement (164 words)

When used as a vertebral body replacement, the Crystal device is intended for use in the thoracic and/or thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body resected or excised (i.e., partial or total vertebrectomy procedures) due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture).

This device is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems, anterior plate systems, and anterior screw and rod systems). The interior of the spacer can be packed with allograft or autograft.

When used as an intervertebral body fusion device, the Crystal device is intended for spinal fusion procedures at one level (C3-C7) in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) of the cervical spine. Implants are to be implanted via an open, anterior approach and packed with autogenous bone.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K073351: Crystal.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K073351

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026