510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2013Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Eminent Spine · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Apr 9, 2009 as substantially equivalent to P970015 (Sofamor Danek, 1999) and 8 other predicates after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1984. 701 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Apr 9, 2009
- Review
- 90 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- 1
- Predicates
- 9
Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K841189 (1984). 31 ancestors in all. 701 later devices descend from it, 34 citing it directly.
- Root · 7 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 6 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
- 5 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
- 4 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 3 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 2 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
- 1 generation backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
- This deviceK090064 Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine · 2009
- Descendant · cites it directly · 462 of its ownK131372 Mobis IISignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2013
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 461 of its ownK141405 Mobis II ST Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2014
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 459 of its ownK150481 Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled
- Descendant · cites it directly · 454 of its ownK123206 Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion SystemMaxim Surgical · 2013
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 453 of its ownK140003 Coroent Small Interbody SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014
Showing 5 of 701 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 701 · See all- K131372Mobis IISignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2013 · cites it directly462descendants
- K141405Mobis II ST Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2014 · 2 generations on461descendants
- K150481Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m, Inc. · 2015 · 3 generations on459descendants
- K123206Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion SystemMaxim Surgical · 2013 · cites it directly454descendants
- K140003Coroent Small Interbody SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on453descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −7 | K841189 | Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator | Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. | 1984 | — |
| −6 | K990148 | Stackable Cage System | Depuy Motech Acromed | 1999 | — |
| −5 | K003043 | Surgical Titanium Mesh System | Depuyacromed | 2001 | — |
| −4 | K022793 | Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −3 | K031757 | Peek Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −2 | K033109 | Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements | Scient'X | 2004 | — |
| −1 | K043479 | MC+ Partial VBR | Ldr Spine USA | 2005 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K090064 | Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System | Eminent Spine | 2009 | — |
| +1 | K131372 | Mobis II | Signus Medizintechnik GmbH | 2013 | — |
| +2 | K141405 | Mobis II ST Spinal Implant | Signus Medizintechnik GmbH | 2014 | — |
| +3 | K150481 | Cascadia Interbody System | K2m, Inc. | 2015 | 3 |
| +1 | K123206 | Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion System | Maxim Surgical | 2013 | — |
| +2 | K140003 | Coroent Small Interbody System | Nuvasive, Inc. | 2014 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10 | 0 |
| 2016 | 16 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42 | 0 |
| 2018 | 47 | 0 |
| 2019 | 51 | 0 |
| 2020 | 68 | 0 |
| 2021 | 59 | 0 |
| 2022 | 68 | 0 |
| 2023 | 89 | 0 |
| 2024 | 82 | 0 |
| 2025 | 68 | 0 |
| 2026 | 62 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (9)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | P970015 | Inter Fix Threaded Fusion DeviceSummary page 1…s, as well as various cleared interbody fusionNBR systems: - LT-CAGE® Peek Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device (P970015, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Approved 9/10/03) - BAK® Cage (P950… | 1999 |
| * | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 1…® Peek Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device (P970015, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Approved 9/10/03) - BAK® Cage (P950002, Zimmer Spine, Approved 7/8/03) - RAY® Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019, Stryker, Approved… | 1996 |
| * | P950019 | Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with InstrumentationSummary page 1…ek, Approved 9/10/03) - BAK® Cage (P950002, Zimmer Spine, Approved 7/8/03) - RAY® Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019, Stryker, Approved 9/4/03) - Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025, DePuy,… | 1996 |
| * | P960025 | Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle ScrewsSummary page 1…- RAY® Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019, Stryker, Approved 9/4/03) - Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025, DePuy, Approved 3/4/05) - BAK/C (P980048, Zimmer Spine, Approved 4/20/01)… | 1999 |
| * | P980048 | Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 1…9/4/03) - Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025, DePuy, Approved 3/4/05) - BAK/C (P980048, Zimmer Spine, Approved 4/20/01) - Affinity Cage System (P000028, Medtronic, Approved 6/13/02)… | 2001 |
| * | P000028 | Affinity (TM) Cage SystemSummary page 1…0025, DePuy, Approved 3/4/05) - BAK/C (P980048, Zimmer Spine, Approved 4/20/01) - Affinity Cage System (P000028, Medtronic, Approved 6/13/02) - Zeus Cages (K081614, Interbody Innovations, Cleared 9/5/08)… | 2002 |
| * | K081614 | Zeus Small Cervical Cage and Large, Extra Large, Curved and Straight Lumbar CagesSummary page 1…er Spine, Approved 4/20/01) - Affinity Cage System (P000028, Medtronic, Approved 6/13/02) - Zeus Cages (K081614, Interbody Innovations, Cleared 9/5/08) - MC+ Partial VBR (K043479, LDR Spine, Cleared 6/30/05)… | 2008 |
| * | K043479 | MC+ Partial VBRSummary page 1…nic, Approved 6/13/02) - Zeus Cages (K081614, Interbody Innovations, Cleared 9/5/08) - MC+ Partial VBR (K043479, LDR Spine, Cleared 6/30/05) - Crystal (K073351, Spinal Elements, Inc., Cleared 1/24/08) === Pa… | 2005 |
| * | K073351 | CrystalSummary page 1…terbody Innovations, Cleared 9/5/08) - MC+ Partial VBR (K043479, LDR Spine, Cleared 6/30/05) - Crystal (K073351, Spinal Elements, Inc., Cleared 1/24/08)… | 2008 |
What descends from it? (701)
See all 70134 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K131372 | Mobis II | 2013 | 462 |
| K123206 | Maxim Surgical X-Treme Interbody Fusion System | 2013 | 454 |
| K113518 | Arena-C Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion System | 2012 | 193 |
| K142026 | Spinefrontier Arena-C HA Peek Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | 2014 | 190 |
| K103034 | Genesys Spine Interbody Fusion System | 2010 | 137 |
| K150847 | Foundation Interbody Devices | 2015 | 29 |
| K111820 | Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif Cage | 2012 | 20 |
| K123969 | Xiphos | 2013 | 14 |
| K150812 | Genesys Spine Apache Cervical Interbody Fusion System | 2015 | 12 |
| K130317 | Genesys Spine Apache Ibfd Star Cervical System | 2013 | 9 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2013 | Class II | Z-1417-2013 | Labeling design | The recall of the Loaner Bin and Sterilization Trays for implants and instruments was initiated by Spinal Solutions because the directions for use and surgical techniques were not being provided to every physician and for every surgery. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
- 5 of the 31 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K131372 (Signus Medizintechnik GmbH, 2013) has gone furthest, with 462 descendants of its own.
- 18 other devices also cite its predicate P970015.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Intervertebral Body Fusion Device: The Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System (Sidewinder, Python, and Cottonmouth) is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to Si, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined…
Read the full statement (291 words)
Intervertebral Body Fusion Device:
The Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System (Sidewinder, Python, and Cottonmouth) is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to Si, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate fusion.
The Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System (Copperhead) is indicated for intervertebral body fusion in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine at one disc level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-TI disc. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate fusion. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Vertebral Body Replacement Device:
The Eminent Spine System of implants is indicated for use to replace a vertebral body that has been resected or excised (i.e. partial or total vertebrectomy) due to tumor or trauma/fracture. The Eminent Spine System is intended for use in the thoracolumbar spine (from T1 to L5) and is intended for use with supplemental fixation. These devices are designed to restore the biomechanical integrity of the anterior, middle, and posterior spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period. These devices are intended to be used with autograft or allograft bone.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K090064 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K090064: Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090064
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026