510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2012

Eeg Neuroamp, Model CS10137

K073557510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 28, 200871-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5050Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Corscience GmbH & Co. KG · HCC Device, Biofeedback

Cleared on Feb 28, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K903497 (Thought Technology, Ltd., 1991) and 1 other predicate after a 71-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1995. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Feb 28, 2008
Review
71 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HCC
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K920038 (1995). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K903497 (1991). 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1991: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant clearedK920038 · Neurosearch-4 · Lexicor · 1995K961645 · MRS-2D · Lexicor Medical Technology, Inc. · 1996K990538 · Brainmaster 2E Module and Software Biofeedback Device · Brainmaster · 19991990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K990538 · Brainmaster 2E Module and Software Biofeedback Device · Brainmaster · 1999K961645 · MRS-2D · Lexicor Medical Technology, Inc. · 1996K920038 · Neurosearch-4 · Lexicor · 19950
  1. Root · 3 generations backK920038 Neurosearch-4Lexicor · 1995
  2. 2 generations backK961645 MRS-2DLexicor Medical Technology, Inc. · 1996
  3. 1 generation backK990538 Brainmaster 2E Module and Software Biofeedback DeviceBrainmaster · 1999
  4. This deviceK073557 Eeg Neuroamp, Model CS10137Corscience GmbH & Co. KG · 2008
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK122879 EEGER4 Model 4.3Eeg Software, LLC · 2013
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK222101 PrismGraymatters Health, Ltd. · 2023
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK193159 NeuroAmp II, NeuroAmp II.5sCorscience GmbH & Co. KG · 2020

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K122879EEGER4 Model 4.3Eeg Software, LLC · 2013 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K222101PrismGraymatters Health, Ltd. · 2023 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K193159NeuroAmp II, NeuroAmp II.5sCorscience GmbH & Co. KG · 2020 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K920038Neurosearch-4Lexicor1995—
−2K961645MRS-2DLexicor Medical Technology, Inc.1996—
−1K990538Brainmaster 2E Module and Software Biofeedback DeviceBrainmaster1999—
0 (this device)K073557Eeg Neuroamp, Model CS10137Corscience GmbH & Co. KG2008—
+1K122879EEGER4 Model 4.3Eeg Software, LLC2013—
+2K222101PrismGraymatters Health, Ltd.2023—
+1K193159NeuroAmp II, NeuroAmp II.5sCorscience GmbH & Co. KG2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
202010
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K073557, 1995–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HCC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HCC device

  1. #1 K233580 A Breathing System (ABS)score 8.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K903497Flexcomp DSP & Procomp
Summary page 2
…t Technology Ltd., Montreal, Canada BrainMaster Technologies, Inc., Oakwood Village, OH 44146, formerly: Cleveland, OH 44124 5.8.3 Predicate Device 510(k)# ProComp: K903497 BrainMaster: K990538 Title Premarket Notification for EEG NeuroAmp Document Name Iss…
Thought Technology, Ltd.1991—
*K990538Brainmaster 2E Module and Software Biofeedback Device
Summary page 2
…ntreal, Canada BrainMaster Technologies, Inc., Oakwood Village, OH 44146, formerly: Cleveland, OH 44124 5.8.3 Predicate Device 510(k)# ProComp: K903497 BrainMaster: K990538 Title Premarket Notification for EEG NeuroAmp Document Name Issue…
Brainmaster1999—

Also cleared against K903497: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K122879EEGER4 Model 4.3Eeg Software, LLC20131
K193159NeuroAmp II, NeuroAmp II.5sCorscience GmbH & Co. KG20200

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 15, 2012Class IIZ-0526-2013Labeling False and MisleadingEEG Info, Inc. is recalling the EEG Neuroamp device because they have identified a potential risk associated with the mislabeling of certain devices.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K122879 (Eeg Software, LLC, 2013) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K903497.

How does its category compare?

All HCC devices

HCC Device, Biofeedback: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HCC

1in 2024

2007: 12008: 22010: 12011: 12013: 22015: 22017: 12018: 12023: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HCC

Too few HCC 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HCC

1in 2015

2012: 12015: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HCC

5in 2024

2007: 22008: 22009: 12011: 42012: 22013: 22014: 22016: 42017: 32018: 12019: 62020: 22022: 32023: 22024: 5
2007high 6 (2019) · low 0 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HCC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—02
20082—02
20090—01
20101—00
20111—04
20120—12
20132—02
20140—02
20152—10
20160—04
20171—03
20181—01
20190—06
20200—02
20210—00
20220—03
20231—02
20241—05
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The EEG NeuroAmp is intended for biofeedback and relaxation purposes. To perform its intended function it must be used in combination with a computer and appropriate software. For purposes of this training task, information for feedback maybe derived from one or two channels of EEG and from as many as three channels of pripheral physiology measures such as are conventionally used in biofeedback The EEG NeuroAmp is intended to be used in the office by…

Read the full statement (131 words)

The EEG NeuroAmp is intended for biofeedback and relaxation purposes. To perform its intended function it must be used in combination with a computer and appropriate software.

For purposes of this training task, information for feedback maybe derived from one or two channels of EEG and from as many as three channels of pripheral physiology measures such as are conventionally used in biofeedback

The EEG NeuroAmp is intended to be used in the office by trained professionals who can ensure sound handling practices.

The EEG NeuroAmp is not intended for diagnostic purposes.

"Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician or any other practitioner licensed by the law of the State in which he practices to use or order the use of the device."

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K073557: Eeg Neuroamp, Model CS10137.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K073557

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026