510(k) · Cleared
ClearedTurbo Prime Ibd System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Spineselect, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Apr 16, 2008 as substantially equivalent to P970015 (Sofamor Danek, 1999) and 2 other predicates after a 98-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Apr 16, 2008
- Review
- 98 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to P950002 (1996). 3 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K171656Genesys Spine Apache Interbody Fusion SystemGenesys Spine · 2017 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion System | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K080058 | Turbo Prime Ibd System | Spineselect, LLC | 2008 | — |
| +1 | K171656 | Genesys Spine Apache Interbody Fusion System | Genesys Spine | 2017 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | P970015 | Inter Fix Threaded Fusion DeviceSummary page 1…e(s): The Turbo Prime IBD System was shown to be substant ially equivalent to previously cleared devices iii utding the Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P9700 15), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surg cal Dynamics, P9500 19) and the BAK Interbody Fusion De.vice (Spine Tech, P950002) and has t… | 1999 |
| * | P950019 | Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with InstrumentationSummary page 1…ally equivalent to previously cleared devices iii utding the Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P9700 15), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surg cal Dynamics, P9500 19) and the BAK Interbody Fusion De.vice (Spine Tech, P950002) and has the same indications for use, design, function, and materials… | 1996 |
| * | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 1…Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P9700 15), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surg cal Dynamics, P9500 19) and the BAK Interbody Fusion De.vice (Spine Tech, P950002) and has the same indications for use, design, function, and materials used Per formance Testing: The pre-clinical testing perf… | 1996 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K171656 | Genesys Spine Apache Interbody Fusion System | 2017 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Turbo Prime IBD (Interbody Device) System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-SI. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies who have had at least six months of non-operative care for their DDD. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K080058 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K080058: Turbo Prime Ibd System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080058
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026