510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Spinal Usa Interbody Fusion Device

K080314510(k) TraditionalCleared May 13, 200897-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spinal USA · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on May 13, 2008 after a 97-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 40 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 13, 2008
Review
97 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

40 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant cleared2021: 2 descendants cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2022: 4 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2024: 10 descendants cleared2025: 5 descendants cleared2026: 8 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK080314 Spinal Usa Interbody Fusion DeviceSpinal USA · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 26 of its ownK133827 A-Link ZOsteo Vasive, LLC · 2014 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 25 of its ownK201671 A-Link ZAcuity Surgical Devices, LLC · 2021
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 14 of its ownK222561 AlignAcuity Surgical Devices, LLC · 2022
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 10 of its ownK110442 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC · 2011
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK140280 ForticoreNanovis, LLC · 2014

Showing 5 of 40 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12014: 22016: 32017: 12018: 22019: 12021: 22022: 42023: 12024: 102025: 52026: 8
2011high 10 (2024) · low 0 (2012)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 40 · See all
  • K133827A-Link ZOsteo Vasive, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly26descendants
  • K201671A-Link ZAcuity Surgical Devices, LLC · 2021 · 2 generations on25descendants
  • K222561AlignAcuity Surgical Devices, LLC · 2022 · 3 generations on14descendants
  • K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC · 2011 · cites it directly10descendants
  • K140280ForticoreNanovis, LLC · 2014 · 2 generations on9descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K080314Spinal Usa Interbody Fusion DeviceSpinal USA2008—
+1K133827A-Link ZOsteo Vasive, LLC20142
+2K201671A-Link ZAcuity Surgical Devices, LLC2021—
+3K222561AlignAcuity Surgical Devices, LLC2022—
+1K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC2011—
+2K140280ForticoreNanovis, LLC2014—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201420
201630
201710
201820
201910
202120
202240
202310
2024100
202550
202680
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080314, 2008–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (40)

See all 40

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K133827A-Link ZOsteo Vasive, LLC201426
K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC201110
K212075ShurFit Lumbar Interbody SystemPrecision Spine, Inc.20211

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K133827 (Osteo Vasive, LLC, 2014) has gone furthest, with 26 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Spinal USA Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The device system is designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion. One device is used per intervertebral space. The Spinal USA Interbody Fusion Device ACIF System is intended for use in the cervical spine, from C3 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration…

Read the full statement (249 words)

The Spinal USA Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The device system is designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion. One device is used per intervertebral space.

The Spinal USA Interbody Fusion Device ACIF System is intended for use in the cervical spine, from C3 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The cervical device is to be used with supplemental fixation and autogenous bone graft. Patients should have at least six weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral fusion device.

The Spinal USA Interbody Fusion Device ALIF, PLIF, TLIF System are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to SI, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is to be used with supplemental fixation and autogenuos bone graft. Patients should have at least six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with a lumbar intervertebral fusion device.

The Spinal USA Interbody Device RPIF System is intended to be used only in anterior procedures in which an ALIF device of the same height is implanted. The RPIF device is not meant for stand alone use.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080314: Spinal Usa Interbody Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080314

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026