510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System

K110442510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 9, 2011266-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Nanovis, LLC · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Nov 9, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K091088 (Ldr Spine USA, 2009) and 11 other predicates after a 266-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 2001. 1 of the 95 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 10 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 9, 2011
Review
266 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
12

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K003155 (2001). 84 ancestors in all, the oldest K792352 (1979). 10 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly. 1 of the 95 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2009: 6 other ancestors2008: 10 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall12007: 7 other ancestors1999: 3 other ancestors2005: 3 other ancestors2004: 13 other ancestors2002: 5 other ancestors2001: 8 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors2006: 3 other ancestors2003: 6 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1984: 1 other ancestor1998: 1 other ancestor1980: 1 other ancestor1979: 1 other ancestor2016: 3 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant clearedK003155 · Vertebral Body Replacement · Osteotech, Inc. · 2001K012254 · VBR · Osteotech, Inc. · 2001×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K021791 (2002), K023570 (2002), K030601 (2003) ×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K040536 (2004), K041556 (2004), K043561 (2004) ×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K060719 (2006), K062133 (2006), K070173 (2007) K073285 · Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody Device · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008K100214 · Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion Device · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 201019801990200020102020
  1. Root · 13 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK070173 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK073285 Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK100214 Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010
  6. This deviceK110442 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC · 2011
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 9 of its ownK140280 ForticoreNanovis, LLC · 2014
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK161485 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC · 2016
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK160874 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC · 2016
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK171312 FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC · 2018
  11. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK191822 Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC · 2019
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 12 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  3. 11 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  4. 10 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  5. 9 generations backK030601 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK040536 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  7. 7 generations backK041556 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  8. 6 generations backK043561 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  9. 5 generations backK060719 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2006
  10. 4 generations backK062133 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Spinal and Biologics Div · 2006
  11. 3 generations backK070173 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2007
  12. 2 generations backK073285 Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  13. 1 generation backK100214 Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010
  14. This deviceK110442 Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC · 2011

Showing 5 of 10 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2014: 12016: 32017: 12018: 22019: 12023: 12024: 1
2014high 3 (2016) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 10 · See all
  • K140280ForticoreNanovis, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly9descendants
  • K161485Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC · 2016 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K160874Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC · 2016 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K171312FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC · 2018 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K191822Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC · 2019 · cites it directly2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K003155Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc.2001—
−12K012254VBROsteotech, Inc.2001—
−11K021791Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−10K023570Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−9K030601Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2003—
−8K040536Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
−7K041556Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
−6K043561Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
−5K060719Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2006—
−4K062133Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Spinal and Biologics Div2006—
−3K070173Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2007—
−2K073285Peek Prevail Cervical Interbody DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
−1K100214Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion DeviceMedtronic Sofamor Danek2010—
0 (this device)K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC2011—
+1K140280ForticoreNanovis, LLC2014—
+1K161485Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC2016—
+1K160874Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC2016—
+2K171312FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC2018—
+1K191822Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC2019—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197910
198010
198410
199620
199810
199930
200010
200180
200250
200360
2004130
200530
200630
200770
2008101
200960

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
201630
201710
201820
201910
202310
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K110442, 2001–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (12)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 2
…were the subject of approved PMA applications and were subsequently reclassified as Class 11 devices: LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System from LDR Spine USA, K09 1088; Novel® Spinal Spacer System from Alphatec Spine, Inc., K081730; Choice Spine Cervical Interbody Spacer System from Choic…
Ldr Spine USA2009—
*K081730Novel Cervical Spinal Spacer System
Summary page 2
…reclassified as Class 11 devices: LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System from LDR Spine USA, K09 1088; Novel® Spinal Spacer System from Alphatec Spine, Inc., K081730; Choice Spine Cervical Interbody Spacer System from Choice Spine, LP, K09153 1; CORNERSTONE" PSR Spinal System from Medtr…
Alphatec Spine, Inc.2008—
*K091531Choice Spine Cervical Interbody Spacer System Choice Spine Cervical Interbody Spacer
Summary page 2
…rom LDR Spine USA, K09 1088; Novel® Spinal Spacer System from Alphatec Spine, Inc., K081730; Choice Spine Cervical Interbody Spacer System from Choice Spine, LP, K09153 1; CORNERSTONE" PSR Spinal System from Medtronic Sofamor Danek, K100214; Synthes Oracle Spacer from Synthes Spine, K072791;…
Choice Spine, Llp2009—
*K100214Cornerstone PSR Cervical Interbody Fusion Device
Summary page 2
…Spine, Inc., K081730; Choice Spine Cervical Interbody Spacer System from Choice Spine, LP, K09153 1; CORNERSTONE" PSR Spinal System from Medtronic Sofamor Danek, K100214; Synthes Oracle Spacer from Synthes Spine, K072791;…
Medtronic Sofamor Danek2010—
*K072791Oracle Spacer, Opal Spacer
Summary page 2
…dy Spacer System from Choice Spine, LP, K09153 1; CORNERSTONE" PSR Spinal System from Medtronic Sofamor Danek, K100214; Synthes Oracle Spacer from Synthes Spine, K072791; Page 97 of 9S…
Synthes Spine20071
*K080537L-Varlock
Summary page 3
…KIO'4Z P~ 510(k) Summary Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System KI 10442 L-Varlock Lumbar Cage from Kiscomedica, S.A., K080537; WAVE and LOOP Cages from Advanced Medical Technologies AG, K080401; Ardis Spacer from Abbot Spine, Inc. (now Zimmer Spine)…
Kiscomedica S.A.20081
*K080401Shell Cage, Wave Cage, Loop Cage
Summary page 3
…ovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System KI 10442 L-Varlock Lumbar Cage from Kiscomedica, S.A., K080537; WAVE and LOOP Cages from Advanced Medical Technologies AG, K080401; Ardis Spacer from Abbot Spine, Inc. (now Zimmer Spine), K073202; Lumbar I/F Cage with VSP Spine System from DePuy AcroMed,…
Advanced Medical Technologies AG2008—
*K073202Ardis Spacer
Summary page 3
…r Cage from Kiscomedica, S.A., K080537; WAVE and LOOP Cages from Advanced Medical Technologies AG, K080401; Ardis Spacer from Abbot Spine, Inc. (now Zimmer Spine), K073202; Lumbar I/F Cage with VSP Spine System from DePuy AcroMed, P960025; and Spinal USA Intervertebral Body Fusion Device from S…
Abbott Spine, Inc.2008Class I
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 3
…vanced Medical Technologies AG, K080401; Ardis Spacer from Abbot Spine, Inc. (now Zimmer Spine), K073202; Lumbar I/F Cage with VSP Spine System from DePuy AcroMed, P960025; and Spinal USA Intervertebral Body Fusion Device from Spinal USA, K0803 14, K081 196, and K092 193. The subject device an…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—
*K080314Spinal Usa Interbody Fusion Device
Summary page 3
…. (now Zimmer Spine), K073202; Lumbar I/F Cage with VSP Spine System from DePuy AcroMed, P960025; and Spinal USA Intervertebral Body Fusion Device from Spinal USA, K0803 14, K081 196, and K092 193. The subject device and the predicate devices have the same intended use and have the same technologi…
Spinal USA2008—
*K081196Spinal Usa VBR System
Summary page 3
…mer Spine), K073202; Lumbar I/F Cage with VSP Spine System from DePuy AcroMed, P960025; and Spinal USA Intervertebral Body Fusion Device from Spinal USA, K0803 14, K081 196, and K092 193. The subject device and the predicate devices have the same intended use and have the same technological charac…
Spinal USA2008—
*K092193Spinal Usa Interbody Cages
Summary page 3
…02; Lumbar I/F Cage with VSP Spine System from DePuy AcroMed, P960025; and Spinal USA Intervertebral Body Fusion Device from Spinal USA, K0803 14, K081 196, and K092 193. The subject device and the predicate devices have the same intended use and have the same technological characteristics. The su…
Spinal USA2009—

Also cleared against K091088: 50 other devices →

What descends from it? (10)

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K140280ForticoreNanovis, LLC20149
K161485Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and Forticore (R)Nanovis, LLC20165
K160874Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System and FortiCore®Nanovis, LLC20164
K191822Nano FortiCore, FortiCoreNanovis, LLC20192

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · Direct predicate · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9 months on median.
  • 10 of the 84 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K140280 (Nanovis, LLC, 2014) has gone furthest, with 9 descendants of its own.
  • 50 other devices also cite its predicate K091088.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one spinal level from C2-T1. These patients should have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. Nanovis…

Read the full statement (205 words)

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one spinal level from C2-T1. These patients should have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and in combination with supplemental fixation indicated for cervical fusion procedures.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System is intended for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one or two contiguous spinal levels from L2-S1. These patients should have had six months of nonoperative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery and/or may have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved spinal level(s). Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and in combination with supplemental fixation indicated for lumbar spinal fusion procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K110442: Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K110442

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026