510(k) · Cleared
ClearedInterfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Jun 10, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K072253 (Synthes Spine Co.Lp, 2007) and 1 other predicate after a 92-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2001. 103 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Jun 10, 2008
- Review
- 92 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K010530 (2001). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest P950002 (1996). 103 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- Root · 3 generations backK010530 Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl. · 2001
- 2 generations backK062083 Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007
- 1 generation backK072253 Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · Recalled
- This deviceK080673 Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2008
- Descendant · cites it directly · 101 of its ownK091988 Modification to: Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device , Model…Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2009
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 98 of its ownK102277 Interfuse T Invertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2010
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 90 of its ownK110226 Interfuse T Invertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2011
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 88 of its ownK123913 Latis SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2013
- Descendant · 5 generations on · 55 of its ownK171848 FORTIFY and FORTIFY Integrated Corpectomy Spacers, XPand Corpectomy…Globus Medical, Inc. · 2017
Showing 5 of 103 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 103 · See all- K091988Modification to: Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device , Model 9076Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2009 · cites it directly101descendants
- K102277Interfuse T Invertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2010 · 2 generations on98descendants
- K110226Interfuse T Invertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2011 · 3 generations on90descendants
- K123913Latis SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2013 · 4 generations on88descendants
- K171848FORTIFY and FORTIFY Integrated Corpectomy Spacers, XPand Corpectomy Spacers, NIKO…Globus Medical, Inc. · 2017 · 5 generations on55descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 | K010530 | Geo Structure | Interpore Cross Intl. | 2001 | — |
| −2 | K062083 | Synfix -LR | Synthes Spine Co.Lp | 2007 | — |
| −1 | K072253 | Synfix-LR Spacer | Synthes Spine Co.Lp | 2007 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K080673 | Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | Vertebral Technologies, Inc. | 2008 | — |
| +1 | K091988 | Modification to: Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device , Model 9076 | Vertebral Technologies, Inc. | 2009 | — |
| +2 | K102277 | Interfuse T Invertebral Body Fusion Device | Vertebral Technologies, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| +3 | K110226 | Interfuse T Invertebral Body Fusion Device | Vertebral Technologies, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| +4 | K123913 | Latis Spacer | Globus Medical, Inc. | 2013 | — |
| +5 | K171848 | FORTIFY and FORTIFY Integrated Corpectomy Spacers, XPand Corpectomy Spacers… | Globus Medical, Inc. | 2017 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4 | 0 |
| 2021 | 5 | 0 |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 |
| 2023 | 13 | 0 |
| 2024 | 19 | 0 |
| 2025 | 19 | 0 |
| 2026 | 15 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kept off the family tree | P95002 | BAK Vista Number could not be read Summary page 1…ith regard to materials, technological characteristics, indications for use and surgical techniques. These predicate devices are: Zimmer / Spine Tech; BAK Vista - (P95002) Synthes Spine; SynFix TM-LR - (K072253) RSB Spine; InterPlate - (K071922) Device Description: VTI's IF… | |
| * | K072253 | Synfix-LR SpacerSummary page 1…cteristics, indications for use and surgical techniques. These predicate devices are: Zimmer / Spine Tech; BAK Vista - (P95002) Synthes Spine; SynFix TM-LR - (K072253) RSB Spine; InterPlate - (K071922) Device Description: VTI's IFD device is made of PEEK, a polymer with a hi… | 2007 |
| * | K071922 | Interplate Interbody Fusion Device, Models C, CGC, L and LGCSummary page 1…gical techniques. These predicate devices are: Zimmer / Spine Tech; BAK Vista - (P95002) Synthes Spine; SynFix TM-LR - (K072253) RSB Spine; InterPlate - (K071922) Device Description: VTI's IFD device is made of PEEK, a polymer with a history of use in interbody fusion device… | 2007 |
What descends from it? (103)
See all 1032 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 8 months on median.
- 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K091988 (Vertebral Technologies, Inc., 2009) has gone furthest, with 101 descendants of its own.
- 27 other devices also cite its predicate K072253.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The InterFuseTM Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The…
Read the full statement (133 words)
The InterFuseTM Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The InterFuse device is to be used in patients who have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion surgery at the involved spinal level(s). The InterFuse device is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft, and to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use by the FDA in the lumbosacral spine.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K080673 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K080673: Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080673
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026