510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Interfuse Invertebral Body Fusion Device Model 9076

K093675510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 23, 200926-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Dec 23, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K080673 (Vertebral Technologies, Inc., 2008) after a 26-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2001.

Decided
Dec 23, 2009
Review
26 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K010530 (2001). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest P950002 (1996). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 1 other ancestor4 generations back: 1 other ancestor K080673 · Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2008K072253 · Synfix-LR Spacer · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · recalledK062083 · Synfix -LR · Synthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007K010530 · Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 20010
  1. Root · 4 generations backK010530 Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl. · 2001
  2. 3 generations backK062083 Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007
  3. 2 generations backK072253 Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp · 2007 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK080673 Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2008
  5. This deviceK093675 Interfuse Invertebral Body Fusion Device Model 9076Vertebral Technologies, Inc. · 2009
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K010530Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl.2001—
−3K062083Synfix -LRSynthes Spine Co.Lp2007—
−2K072253Synfix-LR SpacerSynthes Spine Co.Lp20071
−1K080673Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceVertebral Technologies, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K093675Interfuse Invertebral Body Fusion Device Model 9076Vertebral Technologies, Inc.2009—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
200210
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K093675, 2001–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K080673Interfuse Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Summary page 5
…substantially equivalent in performance, indication, design and material to VTI's own InterFuse® Intervertebral Body Fusion Device cleared under Premarkét notification # K 080673. 3.2 DEVICE DESCRIPTION VTP's Intervertebral Body Fusion device is made of PEEK (Poly ether ether ketone), a polymer with a his…
Vertebral Technologies, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K080673: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 7 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K080673.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The InterFuse® Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The…

Read the full statement (133 words)

The InterFuse® Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for intervertebral spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). The InterFuse device is to be used in patients who have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion surgery at the involved spinal level(s). The InterFuse device is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft, and to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use by the FDA in the lumbosacral spine.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K093675: Interfuse Invertebral Body Fusion Device Model 9076.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093675

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026