510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Flowcare TLG Reagent

K081526510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Aug 14, 200873-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.5220

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Beckman Coulter, Inc. · GKZ Counter, Differential Cell

Cleared on Aug 14, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K990172 (Coulter Corp., 1999) after a 73-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1993. 2 of the 7 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall.

Decided
Aug 14, 2008
Review
73 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GKZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K922745 (1993). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 2 of the 7 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK922745 Cyto-Stat/Coulter Clone CD3(IGG1)-Fitc/T4-RD1Coulter Immunology · 1993
  2. 2 generations backK963263 Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems and Cyto-Stat…Coulter Corp. · 1997 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. 1 generation backK990172 Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems with Cyto-Stat…Coulter Corp. · 1999 · Recalled (Class I)
  4. This deviceK081526 Flowcare TLG ReagentBeckman Coulter, Inc. · 2008

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K922745Cyto-Stat/Coulter Clone CD3(IGG1)-Fitc/T4-RD1Coulter Immunology1993—
−2K963263Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems and Cyto-Stat Tertrachrome…Coulter Corp.1997Class I
−1K990172Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems with Cyto-Stat Tetrachrome…Coulter Corp.1999Class I
0 (this device)K081526Flowcare TLG ReagentBeckman Coulter, Inc.2008—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199320
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081526, 1993–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GKZ device

  1. #1 K250943 Sysmex XR-Series (XR-10) Automated Hematology…score 13.2 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990172Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems with Cyto-Stat Tetrachrome…
Summary page 1
…Candidate Predicates Manufacturer Number FlowCARETm TLG tetraONETM SYSTEM Beckman Coulter, Inc. K990172 Reagent for EPICS XL Flow Cytometry SYSTEM…
Coulter Corp.1999Class I

Also cleared against K990172: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K990172Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems with Cyto-Stat Tetrachrome…Coulter Corp. · 1999 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K963263Tetraone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems and Cyto-Stat Tertrachrome…Coulter Corp. · 1997 · 2 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.0 years on median.
  • 2 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class; 2 have a Class I recall.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K990172.

How does its category compare?

All GKZ devices

GKZ Counter, Differential Cell: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GKZ

4in 2025

2007: 62008: 62009: 62010: 42011: 32012: 32013: 12014: 32015: 32016: 32017: 42018: 32019: 52020: 12022: 32023: 42024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 4
2007high 6 (2007) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GKZ

108in 2025

2007: 117 days median2008: 99 days median2009: 147 days median2010: 290 days median2011: 315 days median2012: 408 days median2014: 165 days median2015: 273 days median2016: 198 days median2017: 280 days median2018: 270 days median2019: 210 days median2022: 638 days median2023: 329 days median2024: 157 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 254 days median
2007high 638 (2022) · low 99 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GKZ

1in 2025

2007: 372008: 52009: 132010: 272011: 282012: 72013: 62015: 32016: 32017: 32018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 22020: 12022: 42023: 12025: 1
2007high 37 (2007) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GKZ

77in 2025

2007: 2682008: 9252009: 5592010: 8962011: 2,9052012: 2,9592013: 3,0702014: 3,1122015: 1,9722016: 3,3382017: 2292018: 4972019: 9082020: 3422021: 3912022: 1982023: 1552024: 1152025: 77
2007high 3,338 (2016) · low 77 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GKZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007611737268
20086995925
2009614713559
2010429027896
20113315282,905
2012340872,959
20131—63,070
2014316503,112
2015327331,972
2016319833,338
201742803229
201832702 (2)497
201952102908
20201—1342
20210—0391
202236384198
202343291155
202431570115
20254108177
202642540—

What is it indicated for?

The FlowCARE TLG Reagent kit combines four fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies in a single reagent formulation. It is intended "For In Vitro Diagnostic Use" for the enumeration of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ absolute cell count and CD34, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ lymphocyte percentage in combination with a White Blood Cell (WBC) Count from a hematology instrument as a dual platform measurement, or independently when used in combination with…

Read the full statement (149 words)

The FlowCARE TLG Reagent kit combines four fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies in a single reagent formulation. It is intended "For In Vitro Diagnostic Use" for the enumeration of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ absolute cell count and CD34, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ lymphocyte percentage in combination with a White Blood Cell (WBC) Count from a hematology instrument as a dual platform measurement, or independently when used in combination with Flow-CountTM Fluorospheres as a single platform measurement.

The FlowCARE TLG Reagent is designed for use on the COULTER® EPICSTM XLTM/XL-MCtTM or a suitably-equipped-flow-ytometer withra 488 umiaser capableof detecting light scatter (forward and side) and a minimum of four-color fluorescence emission detectable in the following ranges: 504 - 541 nm, 568 - 590 nm, 610 -635 nm, and 660 - 680 nm. Users should refer to the manufacturer's instrument manuals for specific instructions for setting PMT voltages and fluorescence compensation prior to analysis.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081526: Flowcare TLG Reagent.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081526

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026