510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1

K082267510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 29, 200879-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Oct 29, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K061362 (Plus Orthopedics AG, 2006) after a 79-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2000. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Oct 29, 2008
Review
79 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K002053 (2000). 10 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK002053 Navitrak System-Optical Option, Model 900.004Orthosoft, Inc. · 2000
  2. 3 generations backK021760 Navitrack System-Optical TKR CT-Less, Model 900.120Orthosoft, Inc. · 2002
  3. 2 generations backK043536 Navitrack System - S&N Image Free KneeOrthosoft, Inc. · 2005
  4. 1 generation backK061362 Pigalileo Total Knee Replacement (TKR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG · 2006
  5. This deviceK082267 Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK090313 Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K090313Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K002053Navitrak System-Optical Option, Model 900.004Orthosoft, Inc.2000—
−3K021760Navitrack System-Optical TKR CT-Less, Model 900.120Orthosoft, Inc.2002—
−2K043536Navitrack System - S&N Image Free KneeOrthosoft, Inc.2005—
−1K061362Pigalileo Total Knee Replacement (TKR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG2006—
0 (this device)K082267Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1Smith & Nephew, Inc.2008—
+1K090313Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1Smith & Nephew, Inc.2009—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200140
200220

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K082267, 2000–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K061362Pigalileo Total Knee Replacement (TKR) System
Summary page 1
…CRIPTIPN 510tK) CLEARANCE DAT PLUS Orthopedics AG PiGalileo Total Knee K Replacement (TKR) System K061362 10/06/06 J~~…
Plus Orthopedics AG2006—

Also cleared against K061362: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K090313Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1Smith & Nephew, Inc.20090

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 10 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K090313 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2009) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K061362.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

The Smith & Nephew PiGatileo System TKR is intended to be used in computer assisted orthopedic surgery to aid the surgeon with bone cuts and implant positioning during joint replacement. Itprovides information to the surgeon that is utilized to place surgical instruments during surgery utilizing anatomical landmarks and other data specifically obtained intraoperatively (e.g. ligament tension, limb alignment, etc.)

Examples of some surgical procedures include but are not limited to:

· Total knee replacement supporting bone referencing technique

· Total knee replacement supporting ligament balancing technique

* Minimally invasive total knee replacement

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K082267: Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K082267

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026