510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1

K090313510(k) SpecialCleared Mar 11, 200930-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · OLO Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Mar 11, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K082267 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2008) after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 2000.

Decided
Mar 11, 2009
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K002053 (2000). 11 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 5 generations backK002053 Navitrak System-Optical Option, Model 900.004Orthosoft, Inc. · 2000
  2. 4 generations backK021760 Navitrack System-Optical TKR CT-Less, Model 900.120Orthosoft, Inc. · 2002
  3. 3 generations backK043536 Navitrack System - S&N Image Free KneeOrthosoft, Inc. · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK061362 Pigalileo Total Knee Replacement (TKR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG · 2006
  5. 1 generation backK082267 Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008
  6. This deviceK090313 Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K002053Navitrak System-Optical Option, Model 900.004Orthosoft, Inc.2000—
−4K021760Navitrack System-Optical TKR CT-Less, Model 900.120Orthosoft, Inc.2002—
−3K043536Navitrack System - S&N Image Free KneeOrthosoft, Inc.2005—
−2K061362Pigalileo Total Knee Replacement (TKR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG2006—
−1K082267Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1Smith & Nephew, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K090313Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1Smith & Nephew, Inc.2009—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200140
200220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K090313, 2000–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OLO device

  1. #1 K240662 Spine Guidance Software (version 5.0); Xia 3/…score 23.7 · 15 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K082267Pigalileo Cas, Version 4.0 and TKR Base, Version 2.1
Summary page 1
…Dscriptiown 51((~ C6ri'66,13e Smith & Nephew, Inc. PiGatileo TKR Base V2.1 /CA V40K082267 10/29/08 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2008—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 11 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All OLO devices

OLO Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OLO

40in 2025

2009: 112010: 92011: 112012: 72013: 72014: 102015: 102016: 142017: 332018: 242019: 352020: 342021: 282022: 402023: 452024: 442025: 402026 (partial year): 42
2007high 45 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OLO

119in 2025

2009: 126 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 138 days median2012: 129 days median2013: 137 days median2014: 119 days median2015: 176 days median2016: 120 days median2017: 91 days median2018: 97 days median2019: 95 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 91 days median2022: 89 days median2023: 90 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 109 days median
2007high 176 (2015) · low 89 (2020)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OLO

1in 2025

2010: 12011: 12012: 12014: 32015: 22016: 32017: 22018: 12019: 12020: 62022: 52023: 7, 1 Class I2024: 42025: 12026 (partial year): 6
2007high 7 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OLO

3,306in 2025

2008: 12009: 42010: 42011: 102012: 602013: 362014: 2452015: 4662016: 7502017: 1,0762018: 1,2302019: 1,5852020: 2,7462021: 1,6962022: 1,5682023: 1,4932024: 2,3532025: 3,306
2007high 3,306 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091112604
2010911314
201111138110
20127129160
20137137036
2014101193245
2015101762466
2016141203750
2017339121,076
2018249711,230
2019359511,585
2020348962,746
2021289101,696
2022408951,568
202345907 (1)1,493
2024449042,353
20254011913,306
2026421096—

What is it indicated for?

The Smith & Nephew PiGalileo Total Knee Replacement (TKR) system is intended to be used in computer assisted orthopedic surgery to aid the surgeon with bone cuts and implant positioning during joint replacement. It provides information to the surgeon that is used to place surgical instruments during surgery utilizing anatomical landmarks and other data specifically obtained intra-operatively (e.g. ligament tension, limb alignment, etc.).

Examples of surgical procedures include but are not limited to:

* Total knee replacement supporting bone referencing technique

* Total knee replacement supporting ligament balancing technique

* Minimally invasive total knee replacement

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K090313: Pigalileo TKR Base V2.3 and Cas V4.1.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090313

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026