510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Biscem Translucent, Model D-45011; Biscem Opaque, Model D-45012

K082449510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 25, 200831-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3275

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bisco, Inc. · EMA Cement, Dental

Cleared on Sep 25, 2008 after a 31-day review. The summary cites one number, which could not be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below). 6 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 25, 2008
Review
31 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EMA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

6 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2023: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK082449 Biscem Translucent, Model D-45011; Biscem Opaque, Model D-45012Bisco, Inc. · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK231552 Dia-CemDiaDent Group International · 2023
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK161256 TheraCemBisco, Inc. · 2016
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK254201 Any-CemMediclus Co., Ltd. · 2026
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK261166 Dia-CemDiaDent Group International · 2026
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK193260 U-Cem Premium & MAZIC CemVericom Co., Ltd. · 2020

Showing 5 of 6 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2016: 12020: 22023: 12026: 2
2016high 2 (2020) · low 0 (2017)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 6 · See all
  • K231552Dia-CemDiaDent Group International · 2023 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K161256TheraCemBisco, Inc. · 2016 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K254201Any-CemMediclus Co., Ltd. · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K261166Dia-CemDiaDent Group International · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K193260U-Cem Premium & MAZIC CemVericom Co., Ltd. · 2020 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K082449Biscem Translucent, Model D-45011; Biscem Opaque, Model D-45012Bisco, Inc.2008—
+1K231552Dia-CemDiaDent Group International2023—
+1K161256TheraCemBisco, Inc.2016—
+2K254201Any-CemMediclus Co., Ltd.2026—
+1K261166Dia-CemDiaDent Group International2026—
+1K193260U-Cem Premium & MAZIC CemVericom Co., Ltd.2020—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
202020
202310
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K082449, 2008–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device

  1. #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
Kept off the family treeK061700FDA’s K061700 is Neotract Anchor
Our reading of the summary gave K061700, FDA’s number for Neotract Anchor (Neotract, Inc.). Its FDA name has none of the distinctive words the summary uses for the device it names, “BisCem”. Kept off the family tree.
Neotract, Inc.2006—

What descends from it? (6)

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K231552Dia-CemDiaDent Group International20231
K161256TheraCemBisco, Inc.20161
K261166Dia-CemDiaDent Group International20260
K193260U-Cem Premium & MAZIC CemVericom Co., Ltd.20200

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K231552 (DiaDent Group International, 2023) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EMA devices

EMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EMA

10in 2025

2007: 62008: 132009: 102010: 142011: 82012: 102013: 122014: 42015: 92016: 102017: 32018: 32019: 72020: 82021: 42022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 102026 (partial year): 7
2007high 14 (2010) · low 2 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EMA

106in 2025

2007: 48 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 86 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 128 days median2013: 178 days median2014: 174 days median2015: 134 days median2016: 182 days median2017: 141 days median2018: 237 days median2019: 127 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 184 days median2022: 245 days median2024: 59 days median2025: 106 days median2026 (partial year): 150 days median
2007high 245 (2022) · low 48 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EMA

1in 2023

2008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 52023: 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EMA

9in 2025

2007: 332008: 502009: 902010: 1062011: 2242012: 2492013: 3852014: 2072015: 852016: 162017: 132018: 42019: 122020: 52021: 82022: 32023: 62024: 52025: 9
2007high 385 (2013) · low 3 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007648033
20081371250
20091086190
201014861106
20118795224
2012101280249
2013121780385
201441740207
20159134085
201610182016
20173141013
2018323704
20197127012
2020816405
2021418408
2022724503
20232—16
202435905
20251010609
202671500—

What is it indicated for?

1. Luting metal crowns, bridges, inlays, and onlays including porcelain-fused-to-metal and composite-to-metal varieties;

2. Luting resin crowns, bridges, inlays, onlays and veneers;

3. Luting metal or non-metal/fiber posts;

4. Luting orthodontic appliances;

5. Luting porcelain inlays, onlays, crowns, and veneers (includes alumina and zirconia).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K082449: Biscem Translucent, Model D-45011; Biscem Opaque, Model D-45012.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K082449

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026