510(k) Report

510(k) · Decided

Decided

Replication Medical Vessel Guard

K082782510(k) TraditionalDecided Apr 2, 2009192-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.3470

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Replication Medical, Inc. · OMR Vessel Guard Or Cover

Cleared on Apr 2, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K061727 (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., 2006) and 1 other predicate after a 192-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1981. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 2, 2009
Review
192 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OMR
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K811841 (1981). 6 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant clearedK811841 · Gore-Tex Cardiovascular Patch · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1981K984526 · Acuseal Cardiovascular Patch · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1999K061727 · Gore Preclude Vessel Guard · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 200619801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants K061727 · Gore Preclude Vessel Guard · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 2006K984526 · Acuseal Cardiovascular Patch · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1999K811841 · Gore-Tex Cardiovascular Patch · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 19810
  1. Root · 3 generations backK811841 Gore-Tex Cardiovascular PatchW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1981
  2. 2 generations backK984526 Acuseal Cardiovascular PatchW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1999
  3. 1 generation backK061727 Gore Preclude Vessel GuardW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 2006
  4. This deviceK082782 Replication Medical Vessel GuardReplication Medical, Inc. · 2009
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK103558 Synthes Scout Vessel GuardSynthes Spine · 2011
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK111048 Synthes Scout Tack FixationSynthes Spine · 2012
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK100984 Xylos Vessel GuardXylos Corporation · 2010

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K103558Synthes Scout Vessel GuardSynthes Spine · 2011 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K111048Synthes Scout Tack FixationSynthes Spine · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K100984Xylos Vessel GuardXylos Corporation · 2010 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K811841Gore-Tex Cardiovascular PatchW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1981—
−2K984526Acuseal Cardiovascular PatchW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1999—
−1K061727Gore Preclude Vessel GuardW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K082782Replication Medical Vessel GuardReplication Medical, Inc.2009—
+1K103558Synthes Scout Vessel GuardSynthes Spine2011—
+1K111048Synthes Scout Tack FixationSynthes Spine2012—
+1K100984Xylos Vessel GuardXylos Corporation2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199510
199610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K082782, 1981–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OMR? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K061727Gore Preclude Vessel Guard
Summary page 1
…Clearance Date PRECLUDE Vessel Guard W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc K061727 8/7/2006 PRECLUDE IMA Sleeve W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc K960532 5/23/1996 The safety and effectiv…
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.2006—
*K960532Preclude Ima Sleeve
Summary page 1
…Date PRECLUDE Vessel Guard W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc K061727 8/7/2006 PRECLUDE IMA Sleeve W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc K960532 5/23/1996 The safety and effectiveness of Vessel Guard is based upon the determination of the substantial equivalence as we…
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1996—

Also cleared against K061727: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K103558Synthes Scout Vessel GuardSynthes Spine20111
K111048Synthes Scout Tack FixationSynthes Spine20120
K100984Xylos Vessel GuardXylos Corporation20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.3 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K103558 (Synthes Spine, 2011) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K061727.

How does its category compare?

All OMR devices

OMR Vessel Guard Or Cover: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OMR

1in 2012

2009: 32010: 32011: 32012: 1
2007high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OMR

78in 2011

2009: 105 days median2010: 62 days median2011: 78 days median
2007high 105 (2009) · low 62 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OMR

No recall names OMR since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OMR

1in 2013

2013: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OMR, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
2009310500
201036200
201137800
20121—00
20130—01
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The EnGuardTM Vessel Guard is indicated as a cover for vessels following anterior vertebral surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K082782: Replication Medical Vessel Guard.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K082782

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026