510(k) · Cleared
ClearedAirstrip OB
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Airstrip Technologies, LP · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal
Cleared on Feb 13, 2009 after a 10-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Feb 13, 2009
- Review
- 10 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HGM
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- This deviceK090269 Airstrip OBAirstrip Technologies, LP · 2009
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK121758 Cerner Fetalink+(VERSION1.0)Cerner Corp. · 2012
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K121758Cerner Fetalink+(VERSION1.0)Cerner Corp. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K090269 | Airstrip OB | Airstrip Technologies, LP | 2009 | — |
| +1 | K121758 | Cerner Fetalink+(VERSION1.0) | Cerner Corp. | 2012 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device
- #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K121758 | Cerner Fetalink+(VERSION1.0) | 2012 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K121758 (Cerner Corp., 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All HGM devicesHGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · HGM
4in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HGM
269in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · HGM
5in 2019
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HGM
99in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3 | 56 | 0 | 35 |
| 2008 | 4 | 75 | 4 | 17 |
| 2009 | 4 | 66 | 6 | 42 |
| 2010 | 4 | 193 | 0 | 64 |
| 2011 | 13 | 141 | 0 | 83 |
| 2012 | 4 | 107 | 0 | 44 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 1 | 16 |
| 2014 | 4 | 231 | 1 | 30 |
| 2015 | 5 | 169 | 0 | 44 |
| 2016 | 1 | — | 0 | 17 |
| 2017 | 3 | 138 | 0 | 27 |
| 2018 | 3 | 258 | 0 | 30 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 5 | 41 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 19 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 71 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 87 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 0 | 69 |
| 2024 | 1 | — | 0 | 174 |
| 2025 | 4 | 269 | 0 | 99 |
| 2026 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
AirStrip OB® is intended to be used by Obstetricians for the following purposes: • To more rapidly and thoroughly respond to a nurse call regarding fetal heart tracings or maternal contraction patterns by viewing the Ma! time waveforms remotely using a Window,, -i:s&ed ia.,,d'o!1 Idevice * To proactively review a fetal heart or maternal contraction tracing of a patient in Labor and Delivery for whom they are responsible but are unable to be present in…
Read the full statement (118 words)
AirStrip OB® is intended to be used by Obstetricians for the following purposes:
• To more rapidly and thoroughly respond to a nurse call regarding fetal heart tracings or maternal contraction patterns by viewing the Ma! time waveforms remotely using a Window,, -i:s&ed ia.,,d'o!1 Idevice
* To proactively review a fetal heart or maternal contraction tracing of a patient in Labor and Delivery for whom they are responsible but are unable to be present in the hospital at that time.
* To review the current Labor and Delivery patient census list.
• Provide a request for remote consultation regarding a fetal heart tracing.
· To remotely review other standard or critical real-time numeric data from Labor and Delivery.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.
https://510kreport.com/device/K090269 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K090269: Airstrip OB.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090269
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026