510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Spinesmith Cynch Spinal System

K090376510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 1, 200943-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spine Smith Partners L.P. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Apr 1, 2009 as substantially equivalent to P970015 (Sofamor Danek, 1999) and 3 other predicates after a 43-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996. 1 of the 481 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 476 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 1, 2009
Review
43 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to P950002 (1996). 4 ancestors in all. 476 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly. 1 of the 481 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1999: 2 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestor2010: 2 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2018: 21 descendants cleared2016: 13 descendants cleared2021: 42 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12015: 4 descendants cleared2017: 13 descendants cleared2019: 32 descendants cleared2025: 63 descendants cleared2020: 40 descendants cleared2024: 78 descendants cleared2022: 55 descendants cleared2023: 58 descendants cleared2026: 50 descendants clearedP950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19961995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 5 descendants3 generations forward: 7 descendants4 generations forward: 29 descendants5 generations forward: 85 descendants6 generations forward: 105 descendants, 1 with a Class I recall17 generations forward: 126 descendants8 generations forward: 82 descendants9 generations forward: 26 descendants10 generations forward: 5 descendants11 generations forward: 2 descendants12 generations forward: 1 descendant P950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19960+5+10
  1. Root · 1 generation backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. This deviceK090376 Spinesmith Cynch Spinal SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P. · 2009
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 473 of its ownK102090 Spinesmith Cynch Spinal System - Visualif Interbody Fusion Implant…Spine Smith Partners L.P. · 2010 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 459 of its ownK141942 Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc. · 2014
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 368 of its ownK150643 Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc. · 2015
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 236 of its ownK152475 FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 220 of its ownK151214 ALIF Interfixated SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015

Showing 5 of 476 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 22011: 12012: 22014: 22015: 42016: 132017: 132018: 212019: 322020: 402021: 422022: 552023: 582024: 782025: 632026: 50
2010high 78 (2024) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 476 · See all
  • K102090Spinesmith Cynch Spinal System - Visualif Interbody Fusion Implant SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P. · 2010 · cites it directly473descendants
  • K141942Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on459descendants
  • K150643Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc. · 2015 · 3 generations on368descendants
  • K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016 · 4 generations on236descendants
  • K151214ALIF Interfixated SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · 3 generations on220descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K090376Spinesmith Cynch Spinal SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P.2009—
+1K102090Spinesmith Cynch Spinal System - Visualif Interbody Fusion Implant SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P.20101
+2K141942Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc.2014—
+3K150643Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc.2015—
+4K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc.2016—
+3K151214ALIF Interfixated SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199920

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201020
201110
201220
201420
201540
2016130
2017130
2018210
2019320
2020400
2021421
2022550
2023580
2024780
2025630
2026500
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K090376, 1996–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P970015Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device
Summary page 1
…cages: - LT-CAGE® Peek Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device (P970015, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Approved 9/10/03)…
Sofamor Danek19991
*P950002Bak Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…(P970015, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Approved 9/10/03) - BAK® Cage (P950002, Zimmer Spine, Approved 7/8/03)…
Zimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
*P950019Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with Instrumentation
Summary page 1
…(P950002, Zimmer Spine, Approved 7/8/03) - RAY® Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019, Stryker, Approved 9/4/03) -…
Stryker Spine19961
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 1
…ed Fusion Cage (P950019, Stryker, Approved 9/4/03) - Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025, DePuy, Approved 3/4/05) SpineSmith Partners, LP 8140 N. Mopac, Bldg I, Suite 1…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—

Also cleared against P970015: 18 other devices →

What descends from it? (476)

See all 476

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102090Spinesmith Cynch Spinal System - Visualif Interbody Fusion Implant SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P.2010473
K110177Helena SystemRoyal Oak Medical Devices20110
K101085Spinesmith Cynch Spinal SystemSpine Smith Partners L.P.20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • 2 of the 4 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K102090 (Spine Smith Partners L.P., 2010) has gone furthest, with 473 descendants of its own.
  • 18 other devices also cite its predicate P970015.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Cynch System is indicated intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to SI, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autografi to facilitate fusion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K090376: Spinesmith Cynch Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090376

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026