510(k) · Cleared
ClearedVanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish Varnish, 5% Fluoride Varnish, Model 12247
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
3M Company · LBH Varnish, Cavity
Cleared on Apr 15, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K982915 (Scientific Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1999) and 2 other predicates after a 48-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2001. 3 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Apr 15, 2009
- Review
- 48 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LBH
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K010957 (2001). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K802926 (1980). 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 4 generations backK010957 Quell DesensitizerJeneric/Pentron, Inc. · 2001
- 3 generations backK033295 Butler Nucare Root Conditioner with NovaminNovamin Technology, Inc. · 2003
- 2 generations backK072342 Sultan Tooth Root DesensitizerDentsply International, Inc. · 2007
- 1 generation backK082198 Durashield PlusDentsply Intl., Inc. · 2008
- This deviceK090519 Vanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish…3M Company · 2009
- Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK100540 Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097CAO Group, Inc. · 2010
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK103160 Nupro Model 13016901CAO Group, Inc. · 2011
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK140349 Starbright 5% Sodium Fluoride VarnishNanova Biomaterials, Inc. · 2014
Most influential descendants
Showing 3 of 3 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −4 | K010957 | Quell Desensitizer | Jeneric/Pentron, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −3 | K033295 | Butler Nucare Root Conditioner with Novamin | Novamin Technology, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| −2 | K072342 | Sultan Tooth Root Desensitizer | Dentsply International, Inc. | 2007 | — |
| −1 | K082198 | Durashield Plus | Dentsply Intl., Inc. | 2008 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K090519 | Vanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish Varnish, 5%… | 3M Company | 2009 | — |
| +1 | K100540 | Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097 | CAO Group, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| +2 | K103160 | Nupro Model 13016901 | CAO Group, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| +3 | K140349 | Starbright 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish | Nanova Biomaterials, Inc. | 2014 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LBH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LBH device
- #1 K262243 Profisil Freescore 12.8 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K982915 | Sci-Pharm DFV VarnishSummary page 1…avity Varnish Predicate Devices Device 510(k) Sci-Pharm DFV Varnish K982915 Universal Cavity Varnish K802926 DuraShield Plus… | 1999 |
| * | K802926 | Sci-Pharm Universal Cavity VarnishSummary page 1…510(k) Sci-Pharm DFV Varnish K982915 Universal Cavity Varnish K802926 DuraShield Plus K0821 98 Description and Technology Equivalence Vanish TM Varni… | 1980 |
| * | K082198 | Durashield PlusSummary page 1…K982915 Universal Cavity Varnish K802926 DuraShield Plus K0821 98 Description and Technology Equivalence Vanish TM Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish is classified as Cavity Varnish (21 C.F.R§… | 2008 |
What descends from it? (3)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K100540 | Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097 | 2010 | 2 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.3 years on median.
- None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
- Of its descendants, K100540 (CAO Group, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
- 3 other devices also cite its predicate K982915.
How does its category compare?
All LBH devicesLBH Varnish, Cavity: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · LBH
4in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LBH
223in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · LBH
1in 2019
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · LBH
7in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code LBH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 8 | 69 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 6 | 79 | 0 | 3 |
| 2009 | 4 | 69 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010 | 7 | 107 | 0 | 7 |
| 2011 | 3 | 72 | 0 | 8 |
| 2012 | 4 | 83 | 0 | 7 |
| 2013 | 6 | 160 | 0 | 27 |
| 2014 | 6 | 204 | 3 | 40 |
| 2015 | 2 | — | 0 | 14 |
| 2016 | 2 | — | 0 | 12 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 11 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 2 | 13 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 1 | 9 |
| 2020 | 5 | 256 | 0 | 10 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 15 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2023 | 3 | 167 | 0 | 8 |
| 2024 | 3 | 237 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 4 | 223 | 0 | 7 |
| 2026 | 5 | 64 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Treatment of hypersensitive teeth
use on exposed dentin and root sensitivity
under temporary restoratives and cements where post-operative sensitivity is of
concern.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K090519 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K090519: Vanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish Varnish, 5% Fluoride Varnish, Model 12247.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090519
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026