510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097

K100540510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 23, 2010210-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3260

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

CAO Group, Inc. · LBH Varnish, Cavity

Cleared on Sep 23, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K090519 (3M Company, 2009) and 1 other predicate after a 210-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 2001. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 23, 2010
Review
210 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LBH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K010957 (2001). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K802926 (1980). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 other ancestor1980: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant clearedK010957 · Quell Desensitizer · Jeneric/Pentron, Inc. · 2001K033295 · Butler Nucare Root Conditioner with Novamin · Novamin Technology, Inc. · 2003K072342 · Sultan Tooth Root Desensitizer · Dentsply International, Inc. · 2007×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K082198 (2008), K090519 (2009) 19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 5 generations backK010957 Quell DesensitizerJeneric/Pentron, Inc. · 2001
  2. 4 generations backK033295 Butler Nucare Root Conditioner with NovaminNovamin Technology, Inc. · 2003
  3. 3 generations backK072342 Sultan Tooth Root DesensitizerDentsply International, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK082198 Durashield PlusDentsply Intl., Inc. · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK090519 Vanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish…3M Company · 2009
  6. This deviceK100540 Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097CAO Group, Inc. · 2010
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK103160 Nupro Model 13016901CAO Group, Inc. · 2011
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK140349 Starbright 5% Sodium Fluoride VarnishNanova Biomaterials, Inc. · 2014

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K103160Nupro Model 13016901CAO Group, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K140349Starbright 5% Sodium Fluoride VarnishNanova Biomaterials, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K010957Quell DesensitizerJeneric/Pentron, Inc.2001—
−4K033295Butler Nucare Root Conditioner with NovaminNovamin Technology, Inc.2003—
−3K072342Sultan Tooth Root DesensitizerDentsply International, Inc.2007—
−2K082198Durashield PlusDentsply Intl., Inc.2008—
−1K090519Vanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish Varnish, 5%…3M Company2009—
0 (this device)K100540Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097CAO Group, Inc.2010—
+1K103160Nupro Model 13016901CAO Group, Inc.2011—
+2K140349Starbright 5% Sodium Fluoride VarnishNanova Biomaterials, Inc.2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198010
199910
200710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K100540, 2001–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LBH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LBH device

  1. #1 K262243 Profisil Freescore 12.9 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K090519Vanish Varnish, 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish, Model 12245, Vanish Varnish, 5% Fluoride…3M Company2009—
*K082198Durashield Plus
Summary page 1
…Marketed Predicate Devices for Substantial Equivalence: Vanish Varnish, manufactured by 3M Company (KO905 19) DuraShield. manufactured by Dentsplv International. Inc. (K082198) Rationale for Substantial Equivalence: The aforementioned varnishes share similar indications for use on teeth for all…
Dentsply Intl., Inc.2008—

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K103160Nupro Model 13016901CAO Group, Inc.20111

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
  • None of the 8 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K103160 (CAO Group, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LBH devices

LBH Varnish, Cavity: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LBH

4in 2025

2007: 82008: 62009: 42010: 72011: 32012: 42013: 62014: 62015: 22016: 22019: 22020: 52022: 12023: 32024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 5
2007high 8 (2007) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LBH

223in 2025

2007: 69 days median2008: 79 days median2009: 69 days median2010: 107 days median2011: 72 days median2012: 83 days median2013: 160 days median2014: 204 days median2020: 256 days median2023: 167 days median2024: 237 days median2025: 223 days median2026 (partial year): 64 days median
2007high 256 (2020) · low 69 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LBH

1in 2019

2014: 32018: 22019: 1
2007high 3 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LBH

7in 2025

2007: 42008: 32009: 52010: 72011: 82012: 72013: 272014: 402015: 142016: 122017: 112018: 132019: 92020: 102021: 152022: 72023: 82024: 62025: 7
2007high 40 (2014) · low 3 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LBH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200786904
200867903
200946905
2010710707
201137208
201248307
20136160027
20146204340
20152—014
20162—012
20170—011
20180—213
20192—19
20205256010
20210—015
20221—07
2023316708
2024323706
2025422307
20265640—

What is it indicated for?

Ascent F-Coat is indicated for the coating of exposed dentin under temporary restorations, and for the treatment of hypersensitive teeth.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K100540: Ascent F-Coat Model: 006-00097.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100540

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026