510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Valeo Spacer System

K091278510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 28, 2010272-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Amedica Corp. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jan 28, 2010 after a 272-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 of the 602 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 601 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 28, 2010
Review
272 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

601 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly. 1 of the 602 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2020: 64 descendants cleared2015: 10 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2016: 18 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2017: 29 descendants cleared2023: 76 descendants cleared2022: 61 descendants cleared2018: 31 descendants cleared2021: 51 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12019: 44 descendants cleared2024: 83 descendants cleared2025: 73 descendants cleared2026: 58 descendants cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK091278 Valeo Spacer SystemAmedica Corp. · 2010
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 595 of its ownK131082 Interform Interbody Cage SystemNext Orthosurgical · 2013
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 588 of its ownK141665 NuVasive CoRoent SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2015
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 479 of its ownK151472 NuVasive CoRoent Lumbar SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 402 of its ownK150994 NuVasive CoRoent Thoracolumbar ImplantsNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 400 of its ownK153419 NuVasive CoRoent Thoracolumbar SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2016

Showing 5 of 601 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2012: 12013: 12014: 12015: 102016: 182017: 292018: 312019: 442020: 642021: 512022: 612023: 762024: 832025: 732026: 58
2012high 83 (2024) · low 1 (2012)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 601 · See all
  • K131082Interform Interbody Cage SystemNext Orthosurgical · 2013 · cites it directly595descendants
  • K141665NuVasive CoRoent SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on588descendants
  • K151472NuVasive CoRoent Lumbar SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · 3 generations on479descendants
  • K150994NuVasive CoRoent Thoracolumbar ImplantsNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · 3 generations on402descendants
  • K153419NuVasive CoRoent Thoracolumbar SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2016 · 4 generations on400descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K091278Valeo Spacer SystemAmedica Corp.2010—
+1K131082Interform Interbody Cage SystemNext Orthosurgical2013—
+2K141665NuVasive CoRoent SystemNuvasive, Inc.2015—
+3K151472NuVasive CoRoent Lumbar SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2015—
+3K150994NuVasive CoRoent Thoracolumbar ImplantsNu Vasive, Incorporated2015—
+4K153419NuVasive CoRoent Thoracolumbar SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2016—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
201310
201410
2015100
2016180
2017290
2018310
2019440
2020640
2021511
2022610
2023760
2024830
2025730
2026580
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091278, 2010–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (601)

See all 601

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K131082Interform Interbody Cage SystemNext Orthosurgical2013595
K121892Phantom Plus Ceramic Cage SystemAmedica Corp.20127
K143518Valeo Spacer System and Valeo II Interbody Fusion Device SystemAmedica Corp.20155
K192863MONDRIAN Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage SystemCtl Medical Corporation20203

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 5 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K131082 (Next Orthosurgical, 2013) has gone furthest, with 595 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Valeo® Spacer System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The device system is designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion. The device must be used with additional anterior or posterior instrumentation to augment stability. The Valeo® Spacer System -C is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C3 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of…

Read the full statement (191 words)

The Valeo® Spacer System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The device system is designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion. The device must be used with additional anterior or posterior instrumentation to augment stability.

The Valeo® Spacer System -C is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C3 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The Valeo® Spacer System -C is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.

The Valeo® Spacer System -AL, -TL, -PL, -XT are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The Valeo® Spacer System -AL, -TL, -PL, -XT is to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091278: Valeo Spacer System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091278

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026