510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Optimax, Compact 2, Optimax 2010, Ecomax

K091628510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 21, 200978-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1900

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Protec GmbH & Co. KG · IXW Processor, Radiographic-Film, Automatic

Cleared on Aug 21, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K954345 (Doosan Corp., 1995) after a 78-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995.

Decided
Aug 21, 2009
Review
78 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IXW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K954345 (1995). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K954345 · Doosan DSP 3800 Automatic X-Ray Film Processor · Doosan Corp. · 19951995200020052010
  1. Root · 1 generation backK954345 Doosan DSP 3800 Automatic X-Ray Film ProcessorDoosan Corp. · 1995
  2. This deviceK091628 Optimax, Compact 2, Optimax 2010, EcomaxProtec GmbH & Co. KG · 2009
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K954345Doosan DSP 3800 Automatic X-Ray Film ProcessorDoosan Corp.1995—
0 (this device)K091628Optimax, Compact 2, Optimax 2010, EcomaxProtec GmbH & Co. KG2009—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091628, 1995–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IXW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K954345Doosan DSP 3800 Automatic X-Ray Film Processor
Summary page 1
…Classification name: Processor, Radiographic-Film, Automatic Predicate Device: The Predicate Device is a legally marketed, postamendments device: K954345 DOOSAN DSP 3800 Automatic X-Ray Film Processor Device Description Due to the precise roller transport system, bot…
Doosan Corp.1995—

Also cleared against K954345: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K954345.

How does its category compare?

All IXW devices

IXW Processor, Radiographic-Film, Automatic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IXW

1in 2011

2009: 12010: 12011: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IXW

Too few IXW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · IXW

No recall names IXW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · IXW

2in 2018

2008: 12009: 22014: 22015: 22016: 12017: 12018: 2
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IXW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—02
20101—00
20111—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—02
20150—02
20160—01
20170—01
20180—02
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

OPTIMAX, COMPACT2, OPTIMAX 2010, ECOMAX are all Automatic X-Ray Film Processors (Regulation No. 892.1900).

The devices mentioned above are intended to be used to process films exposed for medical purposes. The automatic and continuous process contains developing, fixing, washing and drying of films.

This may be used in all general radiographic, diagnostic imaging procedures.

Typical users of this system are trained medical professionals, including but not limited to physicians, nurses and lab technicians.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091628: Optimax, Compact 2, Optimax 2010, Ecomax.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091628

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026